Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Bang
Bandie8
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 17 (291576)
03-02-2006 6:55 PM


Laws Of Physics..
Ok , You all seem quite smart and Probably already know these things but i feel i should state them anyways.( please excuse my typos)
There are laws of physics that do prove the Big Bang theory Wrong.
1st Law Of Thermodynamics;
This law states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed.
So if energy cannot be created or destroyed..then how did this nothingness compact and explode? Also there is the law of conservation of energy which states that energy can be transfered into different forms. This doesn't mean that its being created or destroyed. For example; when you put fuel into your car, most of it gets transfered into work, and some into the exhast thats goes out your pipe etc. It is NOT being destroyed.
2nd Law of thermodynamics;
This law states that everything is breaking down. (simple Terms)
Everything in the world is being degraded. For example ; You clean a room so that its spotless. You leave it for 50 years. you come back in the room to find dust forming and your furniture on the point of breaking. This is a case of entropy ( 2nd law). Heres the problem- evolutionists believe that everything is becoming more and more advanced. but really if you left the room for 50 years and came back to find your ordinary wooden chairs turned into lazy boy recliners would that make much sense to you?? Its absolutley the opposite.
The Conservation of Angular Momentum;
This states that if something is spinning when it explodes, the fragments will be spinning in the same direction. Also angular momentum cannot appear or dissapear.
So if this theoretical big bang did happen, then why are three planets spinning in Retrograde motion?? For those of you who don't know retrograde motion is when something is spinning the oppisite of the way it should be. Venus, Uranus, and Pluto are all spining in retrograde motion. How do evolutionists explain this? they say that cosmic forces acted upon these planets and forced them to stop and start spinning differently. If this was the case the force needed would be ENORMOUS!
Other problems with the theory;
1. Nothingness cannot compact together and decide to explode
2. There was nothing to trigger this explosion.
3. Total Vaccum does not mean density- the theory states that when the nothingness compacted together, it became very dense. this isnt the case. Total Vaccum is the opposite of total density.
this is very brief , and i could have gone more indepth but i am running short on time.. lol gotta go to school!

-Courtney
[Proverbs 3:5- Trust in the Lord with all Thine Heart; and not unto thine own understandings]

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Son Goku, posted 03-02-2006 7:07 PM Bandie8 has not replied
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 03-02-2006 7:08 PM Bandie8 has not replied
 Message 12 by cavediver, posted 03-02-2006 8:24 PM Bandie8 has not replied
 Message 13 by Chiroptera, posted 03-03-2006 8:29 AM Bandie8 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024