Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Inflationary Cosmology
usncahill
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 23 (164634)
12-02-2004 10:33 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by The Dread Dormammu
11-12-2004 6:53 PM


Re: Umm, not quite.
quoting dread: "all you need is a quantum fluxuation that produces an inflaton feild near in the same place as a singularity and BOOM new universe."
dread, i think the problem with this idea is that you need space to exist before you can have a quantum fluctuation "near" something. "near" implies distance which implies space. are you suggesting that space existed first? also, time would have to exist simultaneously here unless both the singularity and the quantum fluctuation were created and interacted instantly. which brings to mind the question, "what created them?".
-ncahill
ps. feild is spelled field.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 11-12-2004 6:53 PM The Dread Dormammu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 12-03-2004 4:35 AM usncahill has replied

  
usncahill
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 23 (164875)
12-03-2004 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by The Dread Dormammu
12-03-2004 4:35 AM


Re: Umm, not quite.
dread: So we haven't yet answered why there is something rather than nothing. Because we don't know about the prior universe or the neihboring branes.
you can't know about the previous universe, if it existed, because before photon decoupling information about the universe in the form of light could not be transmitted. unless you suggest that we learn about the previous universe in another manner.
also, just a side thought. if there was a previous universe, do you think it still exists outside our visible universe? what existed where our big bang took place would surely have been annihilated and/or displaced by the expansion. any thoughts?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 12-03-2004 4:35 AM The Dread Dormammu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 12-04-2004 8:03 AM usncahill has replied

  
usncahill
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 23 (165135)
12-04-2004 12:31 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by The Dread Dormammu
12-04-2004 8:03 AM


Re: Prior universe
photon decoupling is the stage in the "early" universe, about 300,000 yrs after the BB, when the atoms had expanded and cooled enough to allow photons to move without interacting with atoms' electrons. before this time, photons could not move far before interacting with electrons, preventing any information of the time before decoupling to be transmitted. afterwards, the universe was "transparent" to photons and they could then travel long distances without interaction.
entanglement is connecting two particles using their quantum properties i think.
quote: String theory predicts that perhaps gravity is so weak because it radiates out in more dimentions than, say, light.
i think string theory states that everything exists in all dimensions from light to frogs. we only perceive 3 spatially because after the big bang the other 8 dimensions collapsed do to their unique properties. i think that's what brain greene was trying to say anyway. hehe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 12-04-2004 8:03 AM The Dread Dormammu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 12-05-2004 5:29 AM usncahill has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024