SRO2 
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 10 of 30 (101611)
04-21-2004 5:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 7 by NosyNed
04-21-2004 2:03 AM
|
|
Re: BS and Bafflement
Try standing in front of an Engineering Change Board and giving an "opinion" of a fluid mechanics math model...thats why they call call it science, because it's NOT an opinion.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 7 by NosyNed, posted 04-21-2004 2:03 AM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 11 by RingoKid, posted 04-21-2004 8:42 PM | | SRO2 has replied |
|
SRO2
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 12 of 30 (101696)
04-21-2004 9:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by RingoKid
04-21-2004 8:42 PM
|
|
Re: BS and Bafflement
You constue theory from raw data here. Theory is a postulation of reason(s) for why a thing(s) "might" be. Typically, it is where raw data points subside that "theory" begins. Science by it's nature doesn't draw conclusions from speculation, nor does it stagnate on raw data points...it lies somewhere in between, it's the gray area..."it's finite probabilities drawn from a possibility of infinite data points"....is somebody writing this down?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 11 by RingoKid, posted 04-21-2004 8:42 PM | | RingoKid has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2