light being a promidial factor and not the result of energy and heat, as is posited. We know this by the velosity of light being transcendent of its energy source
So then
all waves are "promidial factors" that are "transcendent" of the source. Why do you keep repeating such fallacies even when corrected?
So there can be a premise for a pre-star light or pre-sun light
And pre-waves
designed for re-heating my leftover lunch. It just doesnt have the same ring to it as light being transcendent and thus confirming your Biblical interpretations.
The latter gives cause to consider that light is more than what we see, and may account for the elusive factor which triggered the BB or the universe: all the data could have been contained in light as a directive program
Nope. Warming food is the key here IamJoseph, prove I am wrong.
I see no difference between an expansion and an explosion. By reductionism, an explosion is an expansion, with a higher time factor only.
Place an icecube on a plate, with a higher time factor it explodes!
We find that even ToE's speciation does not work w/o the seed factor
Asexual reproduction refutes you until you provide a working definition of "seed". Thanks for bringing this up once again, this time in a Big Bang topic no less.
Here, my ponderings asks, is it possible there is a sort of universal manufacturing basement, such as another dimension, which spits out seeds, which in turn become stars and all other things?
There is no evidence that stars need seeds to form. There is no evidence of formed stars containing seeds. There is no evidence of "all other things" needing or having seeds. There is evidence of gravity however and the current theories do just fine in explaining our universe.
all particles have the same base material, thus they must contain seperate wirings/programs to become different products.
The laws of physics. No programs or wires required.
™ Version 4.2