Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The best scientific method (Bayesian form of H-D)
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4090 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 210 of 273 (83842)
02-06-2004 8:02 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by Mammuthus
01-22-2004 3:52 AM


Re: H-D This
I was about to publish a paper on my observations of changes in gene expression in cell types infected with various agents as indicators of the physiological impact of said agents on the cell. I stupidly bothered to do experimental work to both observe and verify the phenomenon. Even worse, I did multiple replicates of all experiments involved in order to better support my initial hypothesis that co-factors in pathogenesis can be demonstrated and identified in response to infection.
There must be something wrong with me, because this sounds really interesting.
Sometimes I wish I was a scientist, but I suppose there's a lot of boring stuff in between all the results.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Mammuthus, posted 01-22-2004 3:52 AM Mammuthus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024