Hi Faith.
I haven't participated in the discussions with you (although I've enjoyed following them) because a) it appears you have more than enough on your plate with about a zillion responses to each post you make, and b) up to now your discussions have been primarily limited to geological topics, a subject about which I know very little having taken a grand total of one (count 'em, one) geology course in my entire life. However, when you make statements such as:
Knowledge of genetics tells us that enormous genetic potentials would have been killed in the flood.
...I feel the need to caution you. You are opening up a humungous can of worms here. If you think the geologists (either amateur or pro) have been difficult to deal with, don't get the biologists and their ilk on this board involved in your discussions. The potential implications of your statement here are enormous - and I don't think you should start a whole new series of discussions until and unless you finish off your geology topics. Might I suggest that you either retract the above statement, or at the very least indicate you will hold it in abeyance until such time as you have the luxury to deal with it? A simple, "Okay, we won't go down that road yet, and I won't bring it up again until later." or the equivalent would be sufficient.
In any event, I'm enjoying your conversations: you are obviously an intelligent, highly articulate writer that is a pleasure to read. I don't want you to disappear under an avalanche of new posts. Even if you're wrong...