Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Scientific Fact versus Interpretation

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific Fact versus Interpretation
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 88 of 144 (296110)
03-16-2006 10:30 PM 		Reply to: Message 10 by Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM

Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff
Right on, Faith. Henry the 8th, relative to a few centuries is apples and oranges to interpreting millions of years scientifically speaking.
​
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 Z Y BUZ SAW
This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Faith, posted 03-15-2006 2:39 PM Faith has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by LinearAq, posted 03-17-2006 8:45 AM Buzsaw has not replied
  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 89 of 144 (296112)
03-16-2006 10:34 PM 		Reply to: Message 72 by jar
03-15-2006 10:38 PM

Re: Finally something that can be tested.
Jar writes:
​
....... Flood never happened Faith and there is no evidence anywhere to support such a myth.
​
Have you viewed ICR's Grand canyon video, pertaining to scientific evidence of the flood?
​
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 Z Y BUZ SAW
This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by jar, posted 03-15-2006 10:38 PM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by jar, posted 03-16-2006 10:41 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 99 by nator, posted 03-18-2006 9:04 AM Buzsaw has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024