Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?
smegma
Inactive Member


Message 230 of 283 (333387)
07-19-2006 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Loudmouth
04-21-2004 7:57 PM


"I have heard many times that the Theory of Evolution is "bad science"."
TOE is more of a "bogus science" than bad science.
here's a good website that debunks TOE.
evolutiondeceit.com is for sale | HugeDomains
{added by Edit - Welcome to EvC. Please take the time to read through our Forum Guidelines. You will find that arguing by cut and paste is not regarded as a good debate tactic around here and is proscribed by our Forum Guidelines. We do not debate websites. Please make your argument in your own words and use weblinks as support. - The Queen}
Edited by AdminAsgara, : removed large cut and paste

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Loudmouth, posted 04-21-2004 7:57 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 231 by Coragyps, posted 07-19-2006 3:38 PM smegma has not replied
 Message 232 by AdminAsgara, posted 07-19-2006 4:19 PM smegma has replied

  
smegma
Inactive Member


Message 233 of 283 (333526)
07-19-2006 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by AdminAsgara
07-19-2006 4:19 PM


Re: Welcome
"One issue that is really frowned upon in debates here is the use of huge cut and paste entries from websites, especially with no input from you. We do not debate websites here. In the future, please post your own arguments in your own words."
i'm not a scientist so i'm gonna need sources(websites) to back up what i say here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by AdminAsgara, posted 07-19-2006 4:19 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by AdminNosy, posted 07-19-2006 8:40 PM smegma has replied

  
smegma
Inactive Member


Message 235 of 283 (333539)
07-19-2006 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 234 by AdminNosy
07-19-2006 8:40 PM


Re: back up.
"Mostly we find that creationist sites post "facts" which are utterly incorrect."
damn!how bias is that lol.i'm done debating here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by AdminNosy, posted 07-19-2006 8:40 PM AdminNosy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by Coragyps, posted 07-19-2006 8:55 PM smegma has not replied
 Message 237 by AdminNosy, posted 07-19-2006 8:55 PM smegma has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024