crashfrog writes:
What does indefensable evidence prove?
To answer this PD writes:
It would prove nothing to you.
I may not be able to defend it to your satisfaction, but I can to mine or another creationist.
This is where the reader or opponent makes their own decision.
So the truth is not important, only that which satisfies is important.
I guess I am not completely following you on this. Are you saying that someone's "evidence" should not be countered just because it is evidence enough for them?
I doubt that you mean that. If we followed that rule then why do we lock up the insane? I mean, obviously they have evidence that is good enough for them that they are sane.
The BTK killer shouldn't be in jail because a church deacon wouldn't do that! That is evidence of his innocence...good enough for some!
Actually, I thought you were arguing that the way the evidence was countered is the problem, not the fact that it was countered at all. I would have to agree with you there.
Hey pastor! Where do we set up the Deuteronomy 23:1 inspection station?
™ Version 4.2
