Haeckels' Drawings Part II

This is a continuation of the closed (300 msg limit) thead:
Message 306It appears to have worked down to trying to decide what the nature of specific structures are. That is what are the pharyngeal arches in embros.This continuation is NOT intended to argue for an explanation of these structures. Just to see if it is possible to finish the argument about whether they are in any way connected across different species and if using diagrams showing them (and other structures) is dishonest or not.That is we are not distinguishing, in the thread, between common ancestry, ID, convergent evolution or special creation as an explanation.

Do we need to mention a time-ordered sequence of fossils that show the development of jaw parts in reptiles becoming more and more over time like the structures in mammals? In other words a sequence at least somewhat like the development of the mammalian embryo?No!, we actually don't since it would be off topic here.

I do to realize how hard it was!!Too hard for me.

From your source:

quote:

---

For reasons elaborated at excruciating length in my Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Darwinian science conclusively disproved and abandoned this idea by 1910 or so, despite its persistence in popular culture. Obviously, neither evolution nor Darwinian theory needs the support of a doctrine so conclusively disconfirmed from within.

---

It was never a big issue, it was no issue at all after 1910.