ID also includes Direct Panspermia, which does not suppose ANY God whatsoever.
And, as it has been mentioned over half a dozen times in this thread, panspermia is no explanation whatsoever. Panspermia just pushes the question back: "How did the creator get created?"
This leads to an infinite regression problem.
Have you an answer for infinite regression?
Not to mention the
fact that ID was cooked up in response to the creos losing a court battle.
Not to mention the
fact that ID was quite literally cut and pasted into a creo textbook, thus "cdesign proponentistsism".
Not to mention the
fact that the leading cdesign proponentists admitted, either on the stand on Dover or in subsequent interviews, that the intelligent designer is god!
While it may be true that many, if not most creationists latched on to the idea if ID, one does not necessitate the other.
Wrong, Juggs. The creos came up with the idea with the express intent of circumventing the ruling in Edwards v. Aguillard.
This systematic suppression of ID is nothing less than coercion.
Ah, you xians jes love to cry persecution, doncha?
ID is not science. That's a fact.
If you think ID is a science, then perhaps you'd like to offer:
1. A method by which ID can be tested.
2. A prediction that ID has made.
3. A new hypothesis proposed by ID.