Age Correlations, step by step.

I am not allowed to say. This is a science forum. SCience is limited to the recent past and present observations. It can't go there.

How it changed is beyond science. But the normal in the future according to the bible is far different as well, for example. Now, it says we live in a temporary universe soon to pass away, with a new ones replacing them. A new universe with no decay, where we and most other things last forever in that new state, and different than present state.Science cannot confirm or deny this. It is far too limited, and MUST suffice itself to observe how things NOW work, and assume and predict they will always work the same, it is all we know. No science exists to back up the claim, of course, now, just assumption.

The JILA team's ability to make two molecular measurements at once enables scientists to apply mathematical calculations to probe the evolution over time of fundamental natural properties such as the fine structure constant, which is widely used in research to represent the strength of electromagnetic interactions. Another research group at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory plans to make similar frequency measurements soon of the same molecules produced in distant galaxies, which are so far from Earth that they represent a window into ancient history. By comparing precision values for the fine structure constant on Earth and in distant parts of the universe, scientists hope to determine whether this constant has changed over 10 billion years. Because the fine structure constant is used in so many fields of physics, these measurements are a way to test the consistency of existing theories. The JILA measurements could enable any change in the fine structure constant over time to be determined with a precision of one part per million.

Again, this assume the light was then the same. In fact the documentation of the bible clearly shows there was plants and light before any stars or sun was made. What kind of light was that? How did it affect plant growth rates? When the sun was created, was it's light also just as it now is? How do you know? Could the lights have been reacting, or combined, or even both seperatly working together for a different end result? You have no idea.
Why would I assume the light was as it now is? Why would I assume it will be when this temporary universe vanishes, and again some men will not need the light of the sun? Why were plants created on day 3, I think it was, and animals and man ate the fruits of trees 3 days later? And, they were not zapped into being either. We ate in the garden, and that garden was "planted".

I gave the example of radioactive decay. Before the big change, the daughter element was present, involved in some fromer process other than decay. After the big change, the process becomes decay, and the daughter material is produced by this new decay process, WE observe this, measure the amount of daughter material, and how long all that would have taken to be produced as a result of decay, and come up with imaginary time! That's all. Save it for star trec.

Atomic level changes, with a fundamentally different process. A different direction than deacy, as we now see. Like it or not, you can't deny it.

Science is a great thing, how the present temporary universe works! That would be a better definition that what we have so far! Now you want us to believe it always will work this way!!? And then teach this a science as well!!!? Heavens. Can you hear yourself here? This is outrageous.

Nice little speech. Too bad it is just poofy fluff. The age correlation you miss is that it all correlates with a young earth.