Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The gentic inheritance of sin - if it is true what are the consequences?
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 136 of 167 (324787)
06-22-2006 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by PaulK
06-22-2006 6:11 AM


Re: does not compute
Because it is evidence of a predator attacking trilobites. You kept asserting that the evidence didn't exist. So the question was necessary to see if you really meant what you were saying.
I think you missed her "point", Paul. She's not denying that predators and predation exist (or existed). She's merely asserting that predators and predation post-date the Fall - an utterly unfalsifiable claim. Why do you bother?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 6:11 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 8:50 AM Quetzal has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 137 of 167 (324792)
06-22-2006 8:50 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Quetzal
06-22-2006 8:46 AM


Re: does not compute
Because it's a good idea for Faith to learn the difference between the evidence and the interpretation of the evidence. In every case she meant the latter (and she did question the evidence of trilobite predation)
Because if Faith won't learn then at least any other readers can see that she is being unreasonable.
Because Creationists often falsely claim that evidence doesn't exist, and people beleive them. Those claims need to be challenged.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Quetzal, posted 06-22-2006 8:46 AM Quetzal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Quetzal, posted 06-22-2006 9:00 AM PaulK has not replied
 Message 147 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 1:25 PM PaulK has replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 138 of 167 (324798)
06-22-2006 9:00 AM
Reply to: Message 137 by PaulK
06-22-2006 8:50 AM


Re: does not compute
Ah well. I have long admitted you have way more patience than I do. I usually feel that it's akin to riding one of those playground carousels - no matter how hard you push, you always end up in the exact same place. Please carry on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 8:50 AM PaulK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by jar, posted 06-22-2006 10:44 AM Quetzal has not replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 139 of 167 (324804)
06-22-2006 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by Faith
06-21-2006 11:40 PM


Re: lions eating grass
No, that doesn't include plants.
How about Euglena? (neither an animal nor a plant) and other protists? Bacteria?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Faith, posted 06-21-2006 11:40 PM Faith has not replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 140 of 167 (324806)
06-22-2006 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 131 by Faith
06-22-2006 4:56 AM


Re: does not compute
Evidence cannot be valid evidence if it contradicts God. It has to be rethought.
Correction: Evidence cannot be valid evidence in Faith's eyes if it contradicts what Faith thinks God says. She must rethink it and make it conform to what she thinks God has said. You are entitled to your own opinion but not to your own facts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 4:56 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 1:48 PM deerbreh has not replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 141 of 167 (324810)
06-22-2006 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Faith
06-22-2006 5:50 AM


Re: does not compute
You do not have the authority to tell me that I am wrong about it contradicting God. It contradicts God.
Let me see if I have this straight. Paulk does not have the authority to say what contradicts God or not but you do?
No wonder we can't get anywhere. You speak for God and the rest of us - well, all we have is logic. This does seem to be an exercise in futility. Why study how things work at all if the final answer is "God did it, I believe it, that settles it." Why do you even debate us folks who are so blinded by our own God given rational minds that we can't accept what a person who speaks for God is saying?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 5:50 AM Faith has not replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 142 of 167 (324821)
06-22-2006 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by Faith
06-22-2006 4:33 AM


Re: does not compute
Such a statement denies the entire history within the Bible and of its transmission and acceptance by the millions through the centuries.
I might also point out that many of those "millions through the centuries" also accepted, based on the Bible that:
The sun revolves around the earth.
The earth is flat.
Slavery is ok, in fact, slaves should obey their masters.
It is ok for a man to have several wives.
It is ok for men to treat women as property.
Black people are the son of Ham and therefore cursed and it is ok to be mean to them and even enslave them.
God commanded the Israelites to kill everyone in Caananite cities, including women, children and doddering old men. This was not only ok but REQUIRED because God commanded it.
Besides, the truth is not determined by majority rule so the fact that millions might have accepted something does not mean it is true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 4:33 AM Faith has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 143 of 167 (324828)
06-22-2006 10:44 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Quetzal
06-22-2006 9:00 AM


Re: does not compute
Ah well. I have long admitted you have way more patience than I do. I usually feel that it's akin to riding one of those playground carousels - no matter how hard you push, you always end up in the exact same place. Please carry on.
Because those carousels can also provide life to a village. In this case it is not for Faith's benefit, but riding the carousel is still doing good, doing GOD's work.
Faith's ideas on the evolution of this earth are totally wrong and there is no possibility of changing her mind, but there are also many lurkers here at EvC, ones whose minds have not yet atrophied, who may be opposing the concept of old earth and evolution because they believe like Faith, that it goes against the word of GOD.
What we do, when riding the carousel, is pump knowledge up to be distributed like lifesaving water to the villagers here. We show them that many Christians, in fact almost every major Christian Church, have no problems with either an old earth or evolution. we show the lurkers that an old earth and evolution, instead of countering the word of GOD, are the Word Of GOD, writ BY GOD, in GOD's hand.
The Universe is the production of GOD and by studying His universe we learn more about how GOD did it. In the words of the Clergy Letter, currently signed and endorsed by over 10,000 US Christian Clergy:
We the undersigned, Christian clergy from many different traditions, believe that the timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist. We believe that the theory of evolution is a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rests. To reject this truth or to treat it as “one theory among others” is to deliberately embrace scientific ignorance and transmit such ignorance to our children. We believe that among God’s good gifts are human minds capable of critical thought and that the failure to fully employ this gift is a rejection of the will of our Creator. To argue that God’s loving plan of salvation for humanity precludes the full employment of the God-given faculty of reason is to attempt to limit God, an act of hubris. We urge school board members to preserve the integrity of the science curriculum by affirming the teaching of the theory of evolution as a core component of human knowledge. We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth.
Yes, we may well be like children riding the playground carousel, but hopefully the water we pump up will bring new life and knowledge to the parched fields of YECs and Biblical Creationists.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Quetzal, posted 06-22-2006 9:00 AM Quetzal has not replied

AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 144 of 167 (324836)
06-22-2006 11:07 AM


Topic, topic, topic
Let's try to get this thread back on topic.
Most of the recent posts should have been in ad-hoc hyper-evolution arguments regarding "the fall".


lfen
Member (Idle past 4707 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 145 of 167 (324849)
06-22-2006 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by iano
06-22-2006 5:57 AM


Re: does not compute
should you suppose that people, en masse, are not able to construct science in a way that does the same kind of thing?
We are talking about evidence and falsifiablity. Science utilizes something of a cybernetic approach to the developement of theories. Mistakes are made, lots of them, and corrections are applied by peer review, review of evidence, new evidence, better experiments, new data, new evidence, new theories, better tools either technological or theoretical.
Taking the universe as God's work it's clearly not something humans made. The collection of copies of copies of scrolls that is called the Bible is clearly something written by the hands of humans in human languages with human ideas. It is a human produced artifact. The universe is not. The actual universe takes precedence over the theories of humans.
lfen
ABE: Ian, if you wish to reply I have copied this over to the admin advised thread:ad-hoc hyper-evolution arguments regarding "the fall"
Edited by lfen, : corrected misspelling of precedence as precedents.
Edited by lfen, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by iano, posted 06-22-2006 5:57 AM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 1:31 PM lfen has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 146 of 167 (324863)
06-22-2006 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by lfen
06-22-2006 4:49 AM


Re: does not compute
EXCEPT where it has the hubris to disagree with the God who made the nature it studies and has given us His revelation to test ourselves by
It doesn't disagree with what God created.
Actually, it must, because if it disagrees with what He revealed in His word, it is wrong somewhere.
It's measured the amount of radioactive isotopes left after decay.
Not anywhere near as precisely as everyone likes to pretend, but in any case the interpretation of the results must be erroneous.
It's measured the distance to the stars, the speed of light, etc.
Uh huh, and nobody wants it to stop. Some day we'll know what it all means.
It's had the hubris to disagree with pre scientific theories and with those contemporary people who interpret the Bible in a particular way that yields claims that are testable and falsifiable such as the age of the earth.
There's nothing testable and falsifiable about the age of something whose beginning was not witnessed and can't be marked, but only known by inference.
They don't want it to be as it is but rather something simpler that goes with their fancy. God did it the way it is, not the way humans want it to be.
He did indeed do it the way it is, and it certainly isn't human beings who want it to be other than science says, since people trust science/their own intellect more than God as a rule. It's His own word that disagrees with science.
YEC has been falsified
Yes, in the minds of many, but not in reality.
so maybe current HUMAN authorities that you are relying upon need to be examined as to why they are misrepresenting God's work.
Those religionists are the ones demonstrating hubris as they are telling God how he should have made the universe.
Clever reversal of the truth about where the human hubris is operating.
Oops, sorry. OFF TOPIC * OFF TOPIC. Back to the topic which is THE GENETIC INHERITANCE OF SIN
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by lfen, posted 06-22-2006 4:49 AM lfen has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 147 of 167 (324874)
06-22-2006 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by PaulK
06-22-2006 8:50 AM


Re: does not compute
You have not produced evidence against predation's starting after the Fall. I suggested another interpretation in another context. You changed the context. Nobody said fossils don't exist that show all kinds of things. And yes it's about interpretation of evidence. Sometimes one can talk casually. This is a Faith and Belief forum by the way, not Science. Your considerations are really totally off topic here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 8:50 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 1:37 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 148 of 167 (324878)
06-22-2006 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by lfen
06-22-2006 12:12 PM


Re: does not compute
Taking the universe as God's work it's clearly not something humans made.
Would you please get something? SCIENCE IS NOT THE UNIVERSE. THE UNIVERSE IS GOD'S CREATION BUT SCIENCE IS MAN-MADE. STOP ACTING AS IF SCIENCE WERE GOD WHO CAN READ THE CREATION. IT'S NOT AND IT GETS IT WRONG BECAUSE IT'S MAN-MADE. You and others here keep repeating this ridiculously false claim.
SCIENCE IS NOT GOD.
SCIENCE IS NOT THE UNIVERSE.
SCIENCE IS HUMAN INTELLECT.
FALLIBLE.
The collection of copies of copies of scrolls that is called the Bible is clearly something written by the hands of humans in human languages with human ideas. It is a human produced artifact.
It is known to have been inspired by God Himself. It is not a mere human artifact. It does NOT have human ideas. The revelations in it are stratospherically above human ideas.
The universe is not. The actual universe takes precedence over the theories of humans.
Yes, it takes precedence OVER SCIENCE for that reason.
And the Bible is God's word. You are asserting falsehoods galore here.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by lfen, posted 06-22-2006 12:12 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by iano, posted 06-22-2006 1:47 PM Faith has replied
 Message 161 by lfen, posted 06-22-2006 2:09 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 166 by lfen, posted 06-22-2006 2:23 PM Faith has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 149 of 167 (324880)
06-22-2006 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Faith
06-22-2006 1:25 PM


Re: does not compute
Contrary to your desires the Faith and Belief forum does not rule out scientific evidence. And in deference to the topic I don't intend to get into detailed discussions here. But the fact is that evidence exists supporting the idea that trilobites became extinct long before there were any humans.
Are you going to admit to that ? If not, why not ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 1:25 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Faith, posted 06-22-2006 1:43 PM PaulK has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 150 of 167 (324886)
06-22-2006 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by PaulK
06-22-2006 1:37 PM


Re: does not compute
But the fact is that evidence exists supporting the idea that trilobites became extinct long before there were any humans.
Are you going to admit to that ? If not, why not?
I avoid the science threads because I'm getting to the point where I hate science and hate scientists. Rude arrogant people. Something I've learned at EvC.
What is the evidence you are talking about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 1:37 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by deerbreh, posted 06-22-2006 1:50 PM Faith has replied
 Message 156 by PaulK, posted 06-22-2006 1:53 PM Faith has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024