While you have been arguing "at" my position I would like to point out to the rest of the class that you have failed to provide another explanation in the area of possibiltes for the existence of things besides the only two.
Before I went to raise my hand I wanted to first see what your option was. Do I have your possibility summed up correctly here:
Bertot in message 245 writes:
Go Bible, go Bible, go Bible, go Bible, wag you head back and forth and move your shoulders while singing that diddy
Quite a narrow viewpoint. So I will raise my hand.
A large list of dieties. Add each and every one of them to your "two possibilities for the existance of things". Why so picky?