Death?

Im not sure but what exactly is it that makes a thread worthy of 'The Great Debate' Forum or 'Topical Discussion' Forum, it seems in my opinion it should be more of Topical Discussion material, but for the sake of argument I'll do responses anyways."However, I can see little reason as to why death should occur under an evolutionary model."
--I don't know what would be the blunder of why it should occur, but it is known why, because ur parts wear out! Though I'm not an evolutionist and I'm glad to see more Creationists on the board so mabye we can make it 2 on 7 rather than 1 on 7, hehe. *shrugs*. Parts didn't wear out the way they do today before the Flood, a simple mutation could conteract the effect of our limited old age to 120 years, There is a sort of 'chain' in your chromosome, that is called something like a tellemar(if thats how you spell it) and every time a cell multiplies a peice of that chain is taken away, after there is no more chain the cell no longer replicates, thus you die of 'old age'. If you don't contract diseases, or die of some other cause this is a reason people could live so long before, and is also why cancer cells replicate continuously, for some reason they don't have this chain.---------------

The question seems simple enough, though when you really think about it, its sorta mind-boggling...either that or its cause I need some more caffine tonight. ----------------

"Lions,wolves and the like cannot be sustained by plants like herbivores"
--Actually it is found the contrary in some cases, I found a great article on AiG about a Lion named Little Tyke that wouldn't eat meat and lived on vegitation, the Lion was a herbivor!
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/magazines/docs/v22n2_lion.asp
--This can be used toward people that beleive that because things have sharp teath that they have to eat meat, and that before the Flood everything could have eaten vegetation.----------------

---

This message is a reply to:
	Message 6 by LudvanB, posted 01-19-2002 11:20 AM		LudvanB has replied

---

Replies to this message:
	Message 10 by Nightfall60, posted 01-19-2002 6:58 PM		TrueCreation has not replied
	Message 11 by LudvanB, posted 01-19-2002 8:41 PM		TrueCreation has replied

---

Peek

"I believe that every rule has its exceptions or in this case,its UNIQUE exception although one would have to wonder why then would so many animals by endowed with sharp teeth which do not lend themselves well to the consumption of vegetation."
--Considering this possibility of a lion completely thought as a carnivor, through variation ('e'volution) turning time backwords, it would not be unique in the least. Sharp teath do lend well in the consumption of vegetation, though not highly effective, but then again almost all animals with sharp teeth also have an abundance of molars effective in the herbivor diet. And also, the fruit bat has I believe no molars and all very sharp teeth, yet it eats fruits."And since both grass and animals were present on earth before man,according to the book of Genesis,then the Bible is contradicting itself on the subject...which,BTW is consistant with the belief of 1700 BC people that plants were not living organism but certainly not consistant with what we know today and with what God would have known then"
--What scripture says that you cannot eat plants? Or what part of scripture shows your point. I am unaware of any part of scripture that claims eating grass is a sin.------------------