quote:
Originally posted by NimLore:
For one thing.. God does not need man in order to prove his existance...
hmmm.... God may not need man, but God has certainly left it up to man.
quote:
and the lies of man do not disprove God, even if someone is trying to lie for God..
The question, of course, is if there is so much good evidence for God, why would anyone lie in an effort to prove god's existence? Answer: Because there isn't any good evidence.
quote:
One thing I will say to the extent of people lieing for God.. how about the evolutionists tampering with evidence?
What about it? People tamper with evidence for a hundred different reasons. Science is set up so that these deceptions eventually get worked out. It is called 'peer review' and 'reproducibility of results'
quote:
Even the greatest scientists use the writings of others as factual and if the writing that they used as factual proves to be erronous then so to will there theory
I almost agree. Scientist use the works of their predecessors as the basis for their own work. Otherwise we'd be starting from scratch each generation. But is naive to think that that early work is never rethought and reworked. As for your final statement, a theory based upon an erroneous theory is not automatically falsified, but it does become unsupported. It is still possible that the second theory was right for the wrong reasons.
quote:
unless of course it is designed to go against the argument.. yeah it happens.
Sorry, but.... what?
™ Version 4.2
