Inerrant Bible?

quote:

---

Originally posted by gene90:
Here's a "new" inconsistency I noticed. Compare Luke 23:39 to Matthew 27:32. In Luke, one of the robbers crucified with Jesus reviles him, the other rebukes his fellow and is promised by Jesus that he will have eternal life. In Matthew, both give Jesus a hard time.

​

Then again, does anyone here believe the Bible is inerrant?

---

If this is due to Death I would need to find more harmony here as to the requirement of a literal understanding gene90, but rather it seems to me that the exception is confused with a aposteriori error because the aprioriness is not usually (philosophically) suppor()ted.

I had asked a question about this to some dispensationalists in Lewiston not Auburn ME (Known as LA down-east) and they could not the dividing of the word back to this conversation. Maybe I will try it some day. Still reading Jerimiah after Isiah.

I still prefer litterally approaching the reading of the text. The reason is that the IMAGE of organisms with horns I have never been able to remmeber back to my reading of living herps DIFFERENT than the pictures of dino bones. When reading the Bible More literally I find that as I do not really know the dispensationalist techinique I do think now of references in the books and though this may not be my duty to have so divided it I rather once I gain a better literal comprehension THEN go to the Gospels. My feeling is that many Christians tend often than not to Start their. A result is that I am more familiar with Jude than Paul though I read more Paul than Luke for any narrative other i read OT not object technology.

And order rains me a double rain-bow. I heard about chariots.