quote:
his progenote the more simpler form? especially
if the genotype and phenotype aren't so tightly linked.
Oh Yea, here we go................
Well, the notion of "form" would be MORE complicated even if the object denoted was less IF the genotype and phenotype were less linked than any notes"". Symbolic logicians seem not to worry about this stuff and neither did Wolfram but I think that a junk yard would rather look more like a tornado than a frog.
This is the *price* that empiricism PAYS and it has sold it self out to Goethe's ya knew who.....
The *reason* the form connoted is not simpler is because a potentially infinte event, the NAMING of a cell or cellular organism, is doubly (once with 'type' and then with the 'note') is doubly finitized on aposterori purpose. I think this is not correct and but is all the university environment tends to say is higher or promote.