Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Christopher Bohar's Debate Challenge

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christopher Bohar's Debate Challenge
John
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 49 of 191 (21453)
11-03-2002 9:38 AM 		Reply to: Message 48 by Quetzal
11-03-2002 4:03 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Quetzal:
Adminemooseus: Very well. I stand corrected. Obviously I’m unable to understand the subtleties of board policy concerning the level of permitted vitriol — which is of course why I’m not a moderator. Feel free to moderate the farging board any way you wish.
​
Respectfully admins, I am completely with Quetzal on this one.
​
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com
This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Quetzal, posted 11-03-2002 4:03 AM Quetzal has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-03-2002 10:14 AM John has not replied
John
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 129 of 191 (23682)
11-22-2002 9:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 123 by Ten-sai
11-22-2002 7:30 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Ten-sai:
no brains, dolts, witch hunts, crackheads ....
​
Not such a good way to argue young men or women.
​
One speaks to one's audience.
​
quote:
So, I take it your definition of evidence is as follows:
​
actual obsevations, data, experimental results
​
'Cause under this impotent definition (actually it most certainly is NOT a definition of evidence but rather a very lazy description of the scientific method, i.e. a process -- see, I told you that you were out of your field!
​
Lol.... I guess you are in your field? If so, I feel very sorry for the field.
​
What is your definition of evidence? Oh, and prove that you are in the field first, or your opinion isn't valid.
​
quote:
even a "dolt" like me wouldn't be able to show you evidence of Julias Caesar's existence for example, much less Jesus Christ's. Sheesh!
​
Are you joking? Insane?
​
quote:
did you mean any data?
​
Qualify. What are you getting at?
​
quote:
We both know you can't, never have, neither here nor there, now or some other time past; are you too insecure to admit it?
​
All of the evidence points to precisely that.
​
quote:
Anyway, believe what you want, or don't believe; what do I care?
​
Don't know. What DO you care?
​
quote:
Just don't think you are going to get very far with me making up stories about evidence when you can't even define the word.
​
Well, set the example for us.
​
quote:
Ten-sai
​
Does this moniker reveal a penchant for playing video games?
​
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com
This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Ten-sai, posted 11-22-2002 7:30 AM Ten-sai has not replied
John
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 150 of 191 (24089)
11-24-2002 4:24 PM 		Reply to: Message 149 by Ten-sai
11-24-2002 3:48 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Ten-sai:
Second, science doesn’t have any rules of evidence.
​
LOL......
​
You've now proven that you are in fact a lawyer.
​
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com
This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Ten-sai, posted 11-24-2002 3:48 PM Ten-sai has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024