Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Population Genetics
gogekin
Junior Member (Idle past 6185 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 05-22-2007


Message 87 of 90 (401836)
05-22-2007 12:21 PM


A question about population genetics and evolution
This occurred to me when I was reading Dawkins' "The Blind Watchmaker". He clearly separates two aspects of genetic information: (i) genetic "address space", which specifies the location of each gene, regulatory element etc. on the DNA, (ii) the genetic content.
In a single species, the address space is common, what defines genetic variety is the content.
My question is: In order to split into separate species, the address space has to change (e.g., via gene duplication, chromosome rearrangements). However, once a single individual has a different address space, it does not belong to the species anymore, because it does not have the same address space. It has a unique address space of its own. Assuming sexual reproduction, how can this individual reproduce and pass its novel address space to new generations?
Is there a theoretical explanation for this question? Is there any evidence that it actually happens? I think the answer should be simple, as creationist never use this in their arguments. But the answer can clearly help explain how "macroevolution" occurs.

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Wounded King, posted 05-22-2007 1:16 PM gogekin has replied

  
gogekin
Junior Member (Idle past 6185 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 05-22-2007


Message 89 of 90 (401888)
05-22-2007 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by Wounded King
05-22-2007 1:16 PM


Re: A question about population genetics and evolution
Thank you for the response.
You are right about the "need for speciation". Let me correct: Since different extant species have different address spaces, the address space has to change during the course of evolution.
What I am trying to understand is whether this change is "qualitatively" any different from the change in genetic content. As I understand, your answer is "no", which I am willing to admit. But I believe it is a good exercise (at least for me) on understanding evolution, so I will continue.
Theoretically, the difference between "changing a vector's value in one dimension" is qualitatively different from "adding a new dimension" to the vector. Therefore, although it is apparently true from a biological perspective that there is no qualitative difference between a gene duplication and point mutation in terms of effecting reproductivity, there must at least be a "sharp" quantitative difference. In other words, we cannot expect the gene pool of a particular species to fluctuate significantly in terms of its "genetic address space" (at least, I would guess this is what we observe).
Therefore, it appears to me that the distinction between "genetic address space" and "genetic content" should have something to do with speciation, or find some place in the molecular bases for "punctuated equilibrium". Sorry, I am not fully informed about population genetics, so I might be mentioning something obvious here. Still, I will appreciate if anybody could let me know whether there is any literature that could relate to this "address space" abstraction. Or should I just go ahead and read specifically about gene duplication, chromosome reorganization, etc.?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Wounded King, posted 05-22-2007 1:16 PM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Wounded King, posted 05-22-2007 6:30 PM gogekin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024