quote:
And i quote from the book "Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science" - page 55 - "No one saw the evolution of one toed horses from three toed horses, but that does not mean we cannot be confident that horses evolved" - So whats the deal here? If theres no such evidence where are they getting this information? My opinion is that its really just the opinions and interpretations of the evolutionists themselves
First of all, that there were three toed horses is not in doubt. Given that creationists claim that humans have been around since the dawn of time, how come there are no human records of three toed horses?
Thirdly, there is a chronological progression of horse evolution. That is, older "horses" had three toes and slowly lost two of the toes. The middle toe is all that is left, as seen on living horses. Got to catch the bus, but I can link you to the actual fossils later if you want (or someone can post them for me).
™ Version 4.2