Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Galapagos finches
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 84 of 104 (335358)
07-26-2006 2:55 AM
Reply to: Message 83 by MurkyWaters
07-26-2006 1:16 AM


Re: here we go ...
Murky,
These informational debates will progress a lot better if you can tell us what type of information you are thinking of and especially if you can define it for us or give us some idea how to measure it.
Most creationists choose their own peculiar flavour of information, such as Gitt information over the much more commonly scientifically used Shannon information.
So if you tell us what measure of information you use and how we can tell if it is increased we can look for instances arising from mutation with maybe some natural selection thrown in for good measure.
Perhaps you would like to contribute to the ongoing thread The value of Gitt information
.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by MurkyWaters, posted 07-26-2006 1:16 AM MurkyWaters has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 87 of 104 (335505)
07-26-2006 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by capeo
07-26-2006 3:24 PM


Re: here we go ...
This is a patently false premise propounded by creationists over and over:
http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoMutations.html
I think you overstate here. Certainly there are beneficial mutations but Murky's post doesn't say that there aren't, merely that 'Nearly all' mutations are harmful or neutral.
I would say that for any given organism in any given environment the vast majority of possible mutations would be either neutral or detrimental, but that still leaves an awfully large number of possibly beneficial mutations as well. The only misleading aspect is the emphasis suggests that most will be detrimental while in fact almost all will be neutral with only a small fraction being detrimental, the detrimental fraction is still likely to outweigh the beneficial however.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by capeo, posted 07-26-2006 3:24 PM capeo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by capeo, posted 07-26-2006 6:55 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024