Evolution of "light"

Um, nope. Straw-man. Evolutionists only think life evolved, because evolution is a theory about living things.So, where did light come from? It appears to be inherent in the structure of the universe. It is one of the four fundamental forces, after all.

Except for those things that don't need light. Chemosynthetic bacteria, for instance. Wrong.Life evolved in the presence of light, that is to say, the sun. Since the sun is ready energy, and life needs energy, life evolved to take advantage of the sun. When life arises in areas where there is no light, it takes advantage of other sources of energy. For instance the heat of deep-sea vents.What about this is hard to understand? Light isn't magic, and neither is life. Maybe because you ask stupid questions that no serious person would waste time trying to answer? That's not winning.

Yeah, yeah, we heard you the first time. You were just as wrong. There's plenty of life that does just fine without the presence of light. Of course, it's in places where there's no light. Yeah, I was aware of that. So? High-energy photons are mutagens. So what? It didn't. Only living things evolve. Light is fundamental to the universe. Where did the universe come from? Hell if I know. Why? It's all the same - it's all just light.

You know, the "colors" are just arbitrary designations to certain wavelengths of light. I don't see what that has to do with anything. But the way you talk about light suggests you don't know the first thing about it. Uh, the word would be its "evolution". Not "evolvement", which is not a word.But I did explain it. Light didn't evolve because only living things evolve. You're using the wrong verb, here.Light is a fundamental force of the universe. The universe has fundamental qualities, like matter and gravity. The electromagnetic spectrum is simply one of those.

Whatever chemosynthetic bacteria eat. After all they're the bottom of the food chain around deep-sea vents.

Actually, it's funny you should put it that way - I'm living proof that you can walk before you can crawl. Seriously, ask my parents! I never crawled as a child. I just got up and walked, one day.It's weird, I know, but it's true. You don't have to crawl before you can walk.

Oh, I'm just supposed to take your word for that? I say it doesn't. Now, the way this works is, you try to prove me wrong with evidence. Not just repetition. You're approaching a major violation of the forum guidelines - number 2, especially - because you just keep repeating yourself without either addressing our rebuttals or providing new evidence. No, I did explain. You've just ignored me. Is this how you debate? Ignore your opponent and go on like a broken record? Frankly I'm not impressed.

Do you know something anthropology doesn't? Piltdown man and Nebraska man are hoaxes, sure - and discovered as such by evolutionists, I might add - but Lucy is the genuine article. Of course you don't seem to know what light is, so maybe you didn't know that. No, it's fundamental to the universe. What part of that is hard for you to understand?

No, it's fundamental to the universe. So when the universe happened, light happened.

Yes, clearly you thought you were at a forum where we tolerate empty repetition of pointless questions. Luckily, you were wrong.We answered your question over and over again. How come you ignored us? Is that how you witness for your god? Then I guess you're not interested in our ample evidence for new species? No, I thought not.Well, good riddance. I don't much care to talk with a broken record.

No, that would be cosmology's explanation. You seem to have a problem telling the difference, though...But it's true. There's four fundamental forces in the universe - the electromagnetic force, gravity, and two nuclear forces.

Well, here's a simple rubrik:Evolution = life
Cosmology = space

What, the fact that the universe may have a beginning? While that may be evidence of some god, or not - it's certainly not evidence for the Christian god above any other.

Now there's a question that is the start of wisdom.

You know why what? If you were being sarcastic, I don't understand what you were being sarcastic about.