Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How does Complexity demonstrate Design
DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 1 of 321 (113987)
06-09-2004 5:59 PM


I Can't get this Logic "Because it is Complex it must have Designed"
They're essentially saying, "I don't know, so a god Must Have Done It." It to me is almost like saying "I don't know how Pictures and sound get on the television - so a god must have done it."
The main Idea of this logic is that the universe is so complex it must have been designed, but wouldn’t the designer of the universe be inherently more complex than the universe itself? If this is true , who designed the designer, and so on?
why do these people not see this problem? They can think deep enough to conclude it must be designed... but they can't think any deeper then that? I would like some Comments from Creationists. I would like to understand what you think in regards to this.
why does Complex = Design ?
This message has been edited by DC85, 06-09-2004 07:53 PM

My site The Atheist Bible
My New Debate Fourms!

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 06-09-2004 7:51 PM DC85 has not replied
 Message 7 by Perdition, posted 06-09-2004 10:37 PM DC85 has not replied
 Message 12 by Brad McFall, posted 06-10-2004 12:10 PM DC85 has not replied
 Message 15 by John Paul, posted 06-10-2004 2:50 PM DC85 has not replied
 Message 102 by almeyda, posted 06-22-2004 12:40 AM DC85 has not replied

DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 3 of 321 (113998)
06-09-2004 8:36 PM


I added to it... is that ok?

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminNosy, posted 06-09-2004 8:56 PM DC85 has replied

DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 5 of 321 (114003)
06-09-2004 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by AdminNosy
06-09-2004 8:56 PM


Re: question and topic
the main point was complexity... I picked the title as an eye catcher... I figured it was related... Can you rename?
This message has been edited by DC85, 06-09-2004 08:06 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by AdminNosy, posted 06-09-2004 8:56 PM AdminNosy has not replied

DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 54 of 321 (114615)
06-12-2004 1:59 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by John Paul
06-11-2004 3:30 PM


Re: on the dishonesty of an evolutionist
WRONG! Trees create trees, bacteria create bacteria and babies come from LIVING organisms.
WRONG! we can clearly see from the fossil record this is not true.... You really need to do some studying... Evolution has been observed... what you can't seem to get through your thick heads is that there is no difference between Micro and Macro Evolution.
Its very simple really... A lot of Micro = Macro (ummm duh?). We have observed what you call "microevolution" and there is no reason to Believe the Organism cannot keep Evolving into completely different things.... unless of course you can prove there is a magic line that stops them from evolving too much... But this is really of topic.
Nature has never been observed to create any information rich systems (i.e. such as life) or specified complexity.
Read above... we have observed in small amounts things getting more complex. There is no reason to believe this can't continue.
Nature does not design cars, computers or vending machines.
ummmm that’s because these things do not have DNA (which at one point wasn't so complex)

My site The Atheist Bible
My New Debate Fourms!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by John Paul, posted 06-11-2004 3:30 PM John Paul has not replied

DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 55 of 321 (114616)
06-12-2004 2:04 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by DarkStar
06-12-2004 1:27 AM


Re: Some Peoples Kids!
Observation alone is sufficient enough to show us that complex = design,
What Observation? Man made objects hardly count. We have also Observed Organisms slowly get more complex... what exactly is your Evidence for this?
This message has been edited by DC85, 06-12-2004 01:05 AM

My site The Atheist Bible
My New Debate Fourms!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by DarkStar, posted 06-12-2004 1:27 AM DarkStar has not replied

DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 66 of 321 (114762)
06-13-2004 12:56 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by DarkStar
06-12-2004 10:11 PM


Re: Some Peoples Kids!
the thing you don't seem to realize is life hasn't always been this complex... so you cannot look at life now and Infer design as it has evolved to become that complex (see my last post in here)
This message has been edited by DC85, 06-12-2004 11:57 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by DarkStar, posted 06-12-2004 10:11 PM DarkStar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by arachnophilia, posted 06-13-2004 1:32 AM DC85 has replied
 Message 68 by DarkStar, posted 06-13-2004 1:37 AM DC85 has not replied

DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 69 of 321 (114771)
06-13-2004 1:45 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by arachnophilia
06-13-2004 1:32 AM


Re: Some Peoples Kids!
I know that.... however I think it is safe to say early life was much less complex

My site The Atheist Bible
My New Debate Fourms!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by arachnophilia, posted 06-13-2004 1:32 AM arachnophilia has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024