Would that all the actual scientists who can confirm how truly wrong you are could engage you in an actual debate. Perhaps then we could all watch and see the frog crash and burn.
However, I am convinced that you would simply dismiss all scientists who do not believe in this myth of macroevolution that you hold so near and dear to your heart, regardless of how many degrees, doctorates, etc. those scientists may hold.
I know for a certainty that there is absolutely no solid scientific evidence confirming macroevolution. There are imperfect speculations, unfounded assumptions, fallacious inferences, superfluous guesswork, and a hell of a lot of wishful thinking, but absolutely no unquestionable scientific evidence whatsoever. None, nada, zip, zero.
If there was even one, just one solid piece of scientific evidence confirming that macroevolution is not a myth, which it most surely is, there would not be any controversy, no ongoing debate. The reason there is controversy, the reason there is debate, is because macroevolution can not be confirmed. No one will ever be able to confirm something that obviously has never happened.
No matter how hard neo-evo's try, they simply are unable to convince anyone who is willing to excercise true common sense, logic, and reason, that macroevolution has ever occurred, is occurring now, or will occur in the future.
This is one of the reasons we have thousands of condemnatory quotes from evolution scientists about macroevolution. They apparently hold to their professional opinions, posting them in various writings, while condemning the very concept of Darwinian macroevolution outside of those same papers, journals, etc., a fact that is made quite evident by the thousands of quotes which, so far, no neo-evo has been able to prove were taken out of context to mean something other than what the scientists actually said, and meant.
Macroevolution is a myth!
I know it, thousands of scientists know it.
Get over it and move on to real science, real evolution.
The theory of evolution is a viable theory, absent the myth of macroevolution.
Once the myth of macroevolution is included, the viability of the theory of evolution vanishes as it slowly evolves into just another example of an implausible story,
nestled amongst the numerous fairytale's of our youth.-----DarkStar
™ Version 4.2
