|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Divine Proportion: Does It Have a Materialistic Explaination? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JasonChin  Inactive Member |
Hey, I was wondering if anybody here knows of any naturalistic theorioes as to why the number Phi, also known as the Divine Proportion or the Golden Section, appears so freakishly often in nature. If there's no possible materialistic explaination for it......and I've never heard or thought of any.......then wouldn't it be irrefutable proof of a creator?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
Phi was the theme of a previous topic (Phi = God?).
There was a bit of good stuff there, but the topic largely degenerated into sillyness. You may wish to consult that topic, and expand the content of your message 1 some. As is, the content is pretty thin. Please submit any revised version of an opening message as a new message. That new message can be advanced as message 1 of a new topic. Adminnemooseus Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to Change in Moderation? or Thread Reopen Requests or Considerations of topic promotions from the Proposed New Topics forum
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JasonChin  Inactive Member |
Gotcha, I'll see what I can do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JasonChin  Inactive Member |
Hey, I was wondering if anybody here knows of any naturalistic theorioes as to why the number Phi, also known as the Divine Proportion or the Golden Section, appears so freakishly often in nature. There are millions upon millions of ways you can derive Phi from the proportions of nature (hence the name "Divine Proportion). For instance, a nautalis sea shell is in spirals. The circumference of one ring to another = 1.618. Sunflower seeds circumference divided by the one below it = 1.618. The circumference of a pine cone ring divided by the one above it = phi. The circumference of the rings on a tree divided by the one before it = 1.618. Your head to your toes divided by your navel to your toes. Your hip to toes divided by your knee to your toes = 1.618. Your shoulder to your finger tips, divided by your elbow to your fingertips = 1.618. Those are just a few examples look it up online for more. BUT the one I find the most interesting is this. In any Honey bee colony in the world, ANY ONE, The number of female bees divided by the number of male bees = 1.618
If there's no possible materialistic explaination for it......and I've never heard or thought of any.......then wouldn't it be irrefutable proof of a creator? This message has been edited by JasonChin, 10-08-2004 08:12 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JasonChin  Inactive Member |
How's that?
BTW, I was aware of that past thread on Phi, but the thread was created as a statement and not really a question and, frankly, it wasn't even a well-stated statement. Therefore, people who didn't believe it just kind of made fun of it. I want this thread to be dedicated to people attempting to make a REAL argument against it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminNosy Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: |
Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: |
In any Honey bee colony in the world, ANY ONE, The number of female bees divided by the number of male bees = 1.618 I don't even have to look anything up. This is wrong. Totally. There are a few 10's of thousands of bees in a hive. Most of them are workers (sterile females). There are 10's or hundreds of males. The ratio is never Phi. This message has been edited by NosyNed, 10-08-2004 11:02 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Hey, I was wondering if anybody here knows of any naturalistic theorioes as to why the number Phi, also known as the Divine Proportion or the Golden Section, appears so freakishly often in nature. It's funny that there's enough numbers in the universe that, if you look hard enough, you'll "find" the number that you're looking for, over and over again. Like, 42, or the Law of Fives:
quote: Instead of wondering why it is that you find what you are looking for, you should ask the question: "What is it about the human brain and human psychology that leads me to believe this is significant?" It's called "confirmation bias." You've just forgotten or downplayed every time you've looked for phi and failed to find it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Another reason you might find Phi a lot in plants, etc, is because it's the natural result of the localized way living systems have to organize themselves. From Wikipedia:
quote: Yeah. I just don't see the significance here. It's a natural result of the way living systems have to organize themselves, where each individual unit has no knowledge of the whole, only what's around itself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 507 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
For a starter, you can start considering all the different things in this world that doesn't have phi in it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JasonChin  Inactive Member |
It's funny that there's enough numbers in the universe that, if you look hard enough, you'll "find" the number that you're looking for, over and over again. Like, 42, or the Law of Fives:>>
But Phi appears far more often than these numbers........and always in the same context, I.E. proportions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JasonChin  Inactive Member |
Yeah. I just don't see the significance here. It's a natural result of the way living systems have to organize themselves, where each individual unit has no knowledge of the whole, only what's around itself.>>
1.618 etc. is a VERY specific number. You mean to tell me the human body wouldn't operate if the length of......uh.......whatever it was divided by whatever it was (it's late, brain no work good) was 1.619 instead of 1.618?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
You're right - 1.618 IS a very specific number - that is why it ISN'T found in the proportions of most human bodies.
Is phi a mystical number as claimed in The Da Vinci Code? - The Straight Dope
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rrhain Member Posts: 6351 From: San Diego, CA, USA Joined: |
JasonChin writes:
quote: No, it doesn't. It certainly doesn't appear more often than pi or e. Quick question: Suppose you have a bunch of parallel, straight lines, each one unit apart. You have a bunch of toothpicks, each one unit long. You drop them onto the lines. What are the odds that the pick will cross a line? That's right...pi/4. Now think about it...why might pi have something to do with this?
quote: Let me see if I understand this correctly: You're amazed that a number that is calculated from proportions tends to pop up when dealing with proportions? That's like being amazed that pi comes up when talking about circles (that's a big hint to my question above.) The golden ratio can be approximated by dividing the n+1th and nth terms of the Fibonacci series as n goes to infinity. Now, the Fibonacci series comes up a lot in nature simply due to its intrinsic physical qualities: Add the previous two. That's a very simple thing to do biologically. Want to visualize a Nautilus shell? You can make it with a Fibonacci series: Start with two 1x1 squares side by side. You thus have a 2x1 rectangle. To add another square to the long edge, you need a square that is the sum of the two previous ones: 2x2. Well, now you have a 2x3 rectangle. To add another square to the long edge, you need a square that is the sum of the two previous ones, 3x3. Well, now you have a 3x5 rectangle. As you keep spiraling around and around, you're adding squares that follow the Fibonacci series. And if you draw a quarter circle in each square so that the pathway lines up, that's the spiral of the Nautilus shell. But notice what you did: You calculated the golden ratio simply by adding squares together in a spiral pattern, each one the size of the big side of what you had before.
There is nothing mysterious about this. It's a simple necessity of mathematics. There's no other way it could be. Rrhain WWJD? JWRTFM!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
But Phi appears far more often than these numbers. No way, dude. Didn't you read the Law? Everything is related, directly or indirectly, to five. If you find something that doesn't appear to be, then you haven't looked hard enough yet. It's always true, you just have to look harder.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024