Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution will always be a theory existant
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 2 of 8 (16335)
08-31-2002 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by JJboy
08-31-2002 1:17 AM


quote:
Originally posted by JJboy:
[B] Evolution will never be disproved[/QUOTE]
...nor proved. Nothing in science is ever "proved", once and for all, like a mathematical proof. Evidence either supports a claim or it doesn't, but all theories are open to be changed if new/better evidence is found in the future.
quote:
and not taught in schools, broadcasted by the popular media, and so on.
Why on Earth shouldn't a extremely well-supported unifying scientific theory be taught in schools and broadcasted on the media?
quote:
Not that I can see. Not that I am a genius or anything. As long as people do not want a God, they will always try to explain how they came into existence without him.
What a strange thing to say.
A majority of scientists believe in God. The VAST majority of people in the world belive in God, as well. Most religions have no problem with Biology or science. It's only a few American extreme fundamentalist Protestant Christian groups which have problems with it.
Science says nothing at all about God. Science ignores all of the supernatural, because it is not designed to deal with it.
[QUOTE]Not that this is a surprise or anything. I am not accusing anyone either. I just find it sad. If God hadn't saved me, I know I would be on the other side of the debate. Anyway, that is my opinion. It was kinda spurred by Peter What-his-face saying that Evolution had fallen. It can float, Peter.[/B]
Who told you that God requires you to turn your back on scientific knowledge?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JJboy, posted 08-31-2002 1:17 AM JJboy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nos482, posted 08-31-2002 9:19 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 4 of 8 (16344)
08-31-2002 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by nos482
08-31-2002 9:19 AM


Originally posted by nos482:
[B]
quote:
Originally posted by schrafinator:
A majority of scientists believe in God.
A growing number of scientists are atheists.
No, that's not true. The percentage of scientists who believe in god has held roughly the same for almost 100 years.
What is the source for your assertion?
I would like to correct myself, though, by stating that 40% of scientists believe in god, not a majority as previously stated.
quote:
The VAST majority of people in the world belive in God, as well.
Actually no, a vast majority of people in the world don't believe in God. Most believe in a god(s). Not everyone believes in the same god(s).
Um, this counts as believing in supernatural, supreme forces of some kind, which falls under tha definition of "god". If we are talking about Protestant Christians, then you should have said so.
quote:
Most religions have no problem with Biology or science. It's only a few American extreme fundamentalist Protestant Christian groups which have problems with it.
Exactly. As I've stated before American science education is a joke.
So, what is your point?
quote:
Science says nothing at all about God. Science ignores all of the supernatural, because it is not designed to deal with it.
Yes, it only deals with that which actually exists.
Not quite correct. It deals with what we can sense with our five senses. Other things might exist ouside of this, but we have no way to tell. It is a philosophical distinction, but important.
quote:
Who told you that God requires you to turn your back on scientific knowledge?
At one time the Church had tried to use science to prove the existence of their god, but when they eventually found out that it could only show the opposite they worked to suppress science by any means necessary.
Right. So I can't tell if you are arguing for science or against it.
------------------
"We will still have perfect freedom to hold contrary views of our own, but to simply
close our minds to the knowledge painstakingly accumulated by hundreds of thousands
of scientists over long centuries is to deliberately decide to be ignorant and narrow-
minded."
-Steve Allen, from "Dumbth"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by nos482, posted 08-31-2002 9:19 AM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by nos482, posted 08-31-2002 2:34 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024