|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Why Doesn't God Explain In Person? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
It seems my problem is that I'm seeing ANY compensation for an apparently altruistic action as a mitigator of genuine altruism. Is this faulty logically? I think it might be, but can't quite see how. If it does stand up to a modicum of scrutiny, how do you view this problem? Actually, I just don't acknowledge that there is a problem. We're wandering way OT here so I'll try to keep it brief. Let's say I do something nice for you. Is that a benefit to you? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lfen Member (Idle past 4707 days) Posts: 2189 From: Oregon Joined: |
That is the gift and charge from GOD. He's telling folk that they are capable and should know the difference and choose the better path. I think there is a deeper misunderstood issue here. This discrimination also results in the sense of being separated from God, All That Is. The sense of shame and the burdens that Adam and Eve felt come from that. Near Eastern religions and cultures for some reason don't seem to have accounts from individuals who awakened until perhaps the teachings of Jesus. So the focus remained on the sense of separation and of atonement by sacrifice and following rules. Atonement as At One Ment is acheived with the awakening from the illusion of being a separate being to the process of God as the source and the manifesting of the universe. Language arises from this separation. It is a human artifact. Individuals might translate their understanding into language and claim God speaks. Or translate their words in actions and claim God understands our words. But I hold the source has spoken no languages except as individual beings. Explanations are stories people make up. Being and the universe can be explained by people, but those explanations are abstractions, partial, and can never be the whole truth. We could say when a person explains that is God explaining in Person. But All That Is is much more than persons and there are no true explanations as language can't accurately model totality. So God can't explain in Person because there are no persons and no explanations. lfen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1373 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Near Eastern religions and cultures for some reason don't seem to have accounts from individuals who awakened until perhaps the teachings of Jesus i'm pretty sure i disagree with this, but give me a day or two to find some good evidence. i'm fairly certain there are several old testament prophets that take similar stances as jesus. amos comes to mind, but i'll find you some quotes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lfen Member (Idle past 4707 days) Posts: 2189 From: Oregon Joined: |
Oh, I'm interested for sure. thanks,
lfen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tusko Member (Idle past 131 days) Posts: 615 From: London, UK Joined: |
whoops... sorry, I thought I'd replied to this already.
If you do something nice for me, I think that's of benefit for me. Thats like saying that if I do something of benefit for you, you get some benefit, isn't it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So if I do something for you, you benefit.
Remember we're working based on when you said:
It seems my problem is that I'm seeing ANY compensation for an apparently altruistic action as a mitigator of genuine altruism. Is this faulty logically? I think it might be, but can't quite see how. If it does stand up to a modicum of scrutiny, how do you view this problem? Now if I also get a benefit when doing something good for you, does that diminish the value of what you recieved? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5938 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
jar
Now if I also get a benefit when doing something good for you, does that diminish the value of what you recieved? I would imagine that would depend on whether the action was initiated consciously or unconsciously.The latter would render the motivation vague at best while the former would be argueably opne way or the other.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
If I give you ten dollars do you get ten dollars?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5938 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
jar
LOL If you give me ten dollars I end up with more than ten dollars thanks to our marvelous Canadian dollar.I do remember a time when I would have been on the losing end though. I will give the arguements some thought and answer later as I am a poor man and must work today.Talk at you later jar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tsig Member (Idle past 2938 days) Posts: 738 From: USA Joined: |
Morals most certainly are a human invention. The story of the Garden of Eden is simply saying that. It's saying, "You know what's right and wrong." That is the gift and charge from GOD. He's telling folk that they are capable and should know the difference and choose the better path. But how did we come to know the difference??
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Think it through completely. I did not mention whose currency. Assume for a second that it is ten dollars Canadian.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
But how did we come to know the difference?? Great question. And of course, not everyone does know the difference. I think in general the way we learn morals is through empathy. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tsig Member (Idle past 2938 days) Posts: 738 From: USA Joined: |
Now if I also get a benefit when doing something good for you, does that diminish the value of what you recieved? No, but it does change your motivation. You act in the hope of a reward.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tsig Member (Idle past 2938 days) Posts: 738 From: USA Joined: |
I think in general the way we learn morals is through empathy. So morals are the result of us being social animals? corrected spelling This message has been edited by Flying Hawk, 11-27-2004 09:50 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
again and it may well be my fault, but let me try to answer.
No, but it does change your motivation. You act in the hope of a reward. It MAY change my motivation. It is not necessarily black and white. My getting something from the act may be incidental, may be unintentional and may even be unknown to me before the fact. I might be motivated by the idea of my getting something, but then, that may not have anything to do with the issue. But in either case it does not reduce the value to you, nor is it necessarily bad. If you have kids, you will understand that there is NO joy greater than what you get from wathching your kids at Christmas or a birthday. They get presents but you get something far greater in the sheer joy of seeing them have fun. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024