Hi Parsimonium,
My views are right in line with yours. I worded my OP poorly on my last edit before submission--what I meant to say is, PLEASE DON'T argue for quantum determinacy for saving free will; I've heard that one and it does nothing for me.
There's one thing that you didn't mention, but only because it wasn't necessary. But just to try and add SOMETHING here
:
You and I agree that free will is apparent, but given the premises that we accept, it is not "true." However, it IS apparent, and we DO NOT have the information available at our fingertips (and maybe in principle cannot have that information, if it is too great to determine within a "reasonable" finite amount of time). So... yeah, there's no free will, but there's every reason to ACT like there is one. In fact, I would argue (like you, I would suspect) that the APPEARANCE of free will (and acting accordingly) is important in survival.
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
Ben