Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   If religion had not happened at all what would the year be?
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 3 of 34 (178994)
01-20-2005 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
01-20-2005 3:07 PM


BCE etc.
Also what if BC and AD hold no meaning would BCE and CE be applicable or would we use something else.
Clearly BCE and CE would be gone too.
There would be some particular point in the history of some nation or empire that would have stuck as the starting point. I'd think it could have been the founding of Rome so we would be somewhere over 2500 after the founding now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 01-20-2005 3:07 PM ohnhai has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Loudmouth, posted 01-20-2005 6:15 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 6 of 34 (179003)
01-20-2005 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by jar
01-20-2005 4:59 PM


common year
It might be, if we adopted it as commerce became world wide that the starting point would be picked to keep dates small (under 10,000) and far enough back to avoid negative dates in recorded history.
That would make the Jewish dating pretty good and we'd have the year as about that of the creationists idea of the years since creation week .

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by jar, posted 01-20-2005 4:59 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by CK, posted 01-20-2005 5:39 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 10 of 34 (179091)
01-20-2005 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by ohnhai
01-20-2005 7:53 PM


Switching calendars.
Cool, I was vaguely aware of that (and the confusion in dating things from records contemporary with the events they portray, the they switched calendars in the 1400s didn’t they, the Gregorian and the other one?)
In all the differing system were the years the same length?
It was two different times when they switched from the Julian calendar (after Julius Caesar) to the Gregorian (after Pope Gregory). The English didn't want to deal with the Popist new-fangled stuff but the calendar got to be 11 days out of whack with the seasons and finally they had to.
Technically the year lengths are not exactly the same. The treatment of leap years makes them (on average) different. If they were the same length the calendar would have continued to diverge from the seasons.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by ohnhai, posted 01-20-2005 7:53 PM ohnhai has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024