Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   If religion had not happened at all what would the year be?
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 34 (179094)
01-20-2005 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by jar
01-20-2005 4:59 PM


Re: Remember that the idea of a yeaar is a pretty recent concept
I agree that the concept of the 'year' would surely have come about regardless of religion. Not only due to commerce, but also because it represents the period of time which encompasses all of the seasons we experience.
The idea that we would have numbered our years based on the founding of Rome makes sense, but I would think it might have been just as likely that we based the number on the advent of written language, or the dividing point between history and prehistory. We might also have "reset the clock" at the invention of the printing press.
One can also imagine that numbering systems in various geo-political regions might have differed for centuries without Christianity. Here in the English-speaking world we might well have reset the numbering at the Norman Conquest of 1066. If we had done so our January 1 (or its functional equivalent) would have been in the fall, during what we call October.
Likewise, America might have had a system starting with what we call 1776, in which case New Years Day would have been in the dead of summer.
At some point an international system of year numbering would have been required, but it should not be taken as a given that the the US would have subscribed to its usage. We still live in the dark ages of weights and measures, after all.

Keep America Safe AND Free!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by jar, posted 01-20-2005 4:59 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Coragyps, posted 01-20-2005 9:19 PM berberry has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 34 (179169)
01-20-2005 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Coragyps
01-20-2005 9:19 PM


Astronomy's use of 4713 BCE as a base date
Coragyps writes me:
quote:
Why they chose that year I know not.
From Cornell's website I found this explanation, which I thought you might also find interesting.
EDITED to add subtitle. And then again to correct it.
This message has been edited by berberry, 01-20-2005 22:05 AM
This message has been edited by berberry, 01-20-2005 22:11 AM

Keep America Safe AND Free!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Coragyps, posted 01-20-2005 9:19 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Coragyps, posted 01-20-2005 11:22 PM berberry has not replied
 Message 25 by Trae, posted 01-20-2005 11:42 PM berberry has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 34 (179179)
01-20-2005 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Trae
01-20-2005 11:42 PM


Re: Astronomy's use of 4713 BCE as a base date
Well, according to the Cornell piece one of the concerns was to find a date prior to any known historical event in order to obviate "BC / AD" type designations. One can imagine that a year in that same century might still have been chosen.

Keep America Safe AND Free!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Trae, posted 01-20-2005 11:42 PM Trae has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024