Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Theory of Evolution
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 63 (18276)
09-25-2002 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Defiant Heretic
09-25-2002 2:57 AM


Wow, great post.
We need more people like you. Watch out for the creationists. This is so concise and well scientifically put.
Welcome to the forum. Look forward to more posts from you.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Defiant Heretic, posted 09-25-2002 2:57 AM Defiant Heretic has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 63 (18568)
09-30-2002 1:58 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by TrueCreation
09-25-2002 5:08 PM


Can you come up with an acceptable theory of creationism that would address everything that would be accepted by the scientific world? I did not think so, becuase you can not.
The theory is a general theory, What does general mean, it means in most cases, in the norm. No it cannot possibly address everything, becuase it was out of this topic's scope. I am sure the original author of this topic could lead you in the right way.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by TrueCreation, posted 09-25-2002 5:08 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by TrueCreation, posted 09-30-2002 5:17 PM acmhttu001_2006 has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 63 (18569)
09-30-2002 2:02 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by peter borger
09-25-2002 11:27 PM


Sure let's poke holes in his theory, which I am not going to do. Where is your theory? Do you have a better one? Do you have one with no loopholes? Did not think so. I do not claim evolution to be perfect, becuase we do not know everything yet. Wonder if we will, but that does not matter.
What matters is that you creationist cannot come up with a plausible theory that the scientists would not find holes to poke into. Sure, and also we can intrepret things the way we want to intrepret them. I am sorry you cannot read simple words and take their simple meanings. Always have to be looking for contradictory meanings. What a meager existance. But the again religionists are famous for taking things out of context, such as their own "bible", why should this be any different? Can they not believe something without trying to change its meaning?
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day
[This message has been edited by acmhttu001_2006, 09-30-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by peter borger, posted 09-25-2002 11:27 PM peter borger has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 63 (18677)
10-01-2002 2:01 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by nos482
09-30-2002 8:03 PM


Yes I did, and I will not settle for Poof the magic God created all the earth. In just seven days there was you and me. We lived in a garden and screwed up royally, and now we are here to ruin the lives' of scientists.
Sorry could not resist.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by nos482, posted 09-30-2002 8:03 PM nos482 has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 63 (18678)
10-01-2002 2:03 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by TrueCreation
09-30-2002 8:15 PM


The only thing that is resonable to you is that POOF GOD DID IT. If anything other than God did it, is is WRONG and ILLOGICAL. Man, what a close-minded view.
Now, before you go and misquote me, I am not saying that THERE WAS NO GOD WHO CREATED THE EARTH, just saying that there is no evidence that I have seen that has led me to conclude this is what happened.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by TrueCreation, posted 09-30-2002 8:15 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Brad McFall, posted 10-01-2002 11:38 AM acmhttu001_2006 has not replied
 Message 44 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:06 PM acmhttu001_2006 has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 63 (18854)
10-02-2002 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by nos482
10-01-2002 6:04 PM


Yep, and if you want another example of sheer meaningless then look at the reply to my post message 37 I think.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by nos482, posted 10-01-2002 6:04 PM nos482 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024