Once you cite ommision of God you contradict the claim that science is true science.
Ah, the old "no true scotsman" fallacy.
As you know, you agreed that when you make assertions around here you will support them with discussion and evidence. Please support that assertion in the
"True science" must include God? topic.
If I went before the board, I would be ready to meet the evidence as well as the godless variety can do!
Certainly not if your performance in this thread is any indication of your knowledge and ability.
Better close the thread quick, so Ned can at least feel he survived round 1!
No need for that; no worries, no problem. You're no threat to the established theories. You're too blinded by your preconceptions to see the light.
Your fellow Creationists would immediately disown you, because they've been working hard to show that Creationism stands independent of God and evangelical Christianity.
Maybe it does.
Creationsits have been trying for many years to show that it does, and they've failed miserably in both the scientific and legal arenas. Especially in the legal arenas, where they've been trying awfully hard to conceal their religious motivations but failed .. because there's absolutely no scientific reason for wanting their twaddle taught in the schools, and that's still obvious to a casual observer.
{edited to add link to new thread}
This message has been edited by JonF, 02-09-2005 08:10 AM