Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Constantly designed baramins and the evolving food chain
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 30 of 40 (200513)
04-19-2005 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by mike the wiz
04-14-2005 2:16 PM


quote:
I've never actually seen chance produce a painting though, or something as obviously designed as the Sistine chapel ceiling fresco. I can tell even hundreds of years later that someone must have created it, and that it didn't paint itself, like people would have me believe? Oops, "designerdidit" again, I really shouldn't do that.
Right.
A designerdidit.
We know the designer. We know exactly how he did the designing. We even have painters today.
You are absolutely correct that paintings do not spring up all on their own.
OTOH...
We don't know who or what your Designer of nature is. We have never seen your creator create any life form the way we have seen people create paintings.
Unlike paintings, living things reproduce and create offspring all by themselves.
Let the record show that this is the 1,984th time I have explained this fallacious argument to mike the wiz, and he STILL insists upon using it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by mike the wiz, posted 04-14-2005 2:16 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Brad McFall, posted 04-19-2005 7:38 PM nator has not replied
 Message 33 by mike the wiz, posted 04-19-2005 8:11 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 36 of 40 (200804)
04-20-2005 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by mike the wiz
04-19-2005 8:11 PM


quote:
Shraff, name the fallacy then.
"Begging the Question" is the fallacious argument you are using.
As this site, one of my all-time favorites explains so well, "it assumes the universe is designed in order to prove that it is the work of a designer."
We don't know who or what your Designer of nature is. We have never seen your creator create any life form the way we have seen people create paintings.
quote:
So you only come to a conclusion he doesn't exist because of your ignorance? An argument from ignorance?
No, this is not the "Argument from Ignorance."
This is the Argument from Ignorance:
Argument from Ignorance
(argumentum ad ignorantiam)
Definition:
Arguments of this form assume that since something has not been proven false, it is therefore true. Conversely, such an argument may assume that since something has not been proven true, it is therefore false.
I have never made the claim that God has not designed anything. I don't know if he did or didn't. I certainly don't see any evidence of his designing anything. Can you show me some?
quote:
But those evidences you call "transitionals" could be said to be many designed proves of the ultimate truths.
I think the absolute nature and truth of designer information in DNA is irrefutable anyway.
Wha??
You are absolutely correct that paintings do not spring up all on their own.
quote:
You miss the point, which is a logical one I thought you might apreciate. The point is that, we know they were designed (the paintings), but a man in a field in a thousand years doesn't and might come to the conclusion that they happened randomly (like you).
Doubtful.
We have artifacts from 10,000 ago years or more that we recognize as being been clearly and unambiguously made by humans.
Oh, and are you talking about randomness WRT the ToE?
Because there is another little element to the ToE that goes along with random mutation that living, reproducing things are subject to that paintings are not.
Can you remember what that little factor, that little important piece of the mechanism is? Come on, tell me what it is. You remember....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by mike the wiz, posted 04-19-2005 8:11 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 37 of 40 (201151)
04-22-2005 10:22 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by mike the wiz
04-19-2005 8:16 PM


bumpepty bump
bump

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by mike the wiz, posted 04-19-2005 8:16 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:28 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 39 of 40 (203609)
04-29-2005 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by mike the wiz
04-22-2005 10:28 AM


Re: bumpepty bump
bebump bebump bebump

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:28 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by nator, posted 05-01-2005 11:10 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 40 of 40 (204088)
05-01-2005 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by nator
04-29-2005 8:38 AM


Re: bumpepty bump
Miiiiiiiikeeeeeeee!
Where are you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by nator, posted 04-29-2005 8:38 AM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024