Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Where did the flood waters come from and where did they go?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev123
Author Topic:   Where did the flood waters come from and where did they go?
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 137 of 160 (220249)
06-27-2005 9:41 PM 		Reply to: Message 126 by TrueCreation
06-27-2005 9:03 PM

Re: TB Tell me again when did Noah's Flood occur
TC
​
Accelerated decay is about as relevant to CPT as abiogenesis is to Evolutionary Theory. The mechanism for CPT is runaway subduction. I do not adhear to CPT and have not for quite a long time, however it deserves more credit than has been given.
​
How do you account for plate tectonics on a YEC timescale in that case?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by TrueCreation, posted 06-27-2005 9:03 PM TrueCreation has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by TrueCreation, posted 06-27-2005 10:19 PM Tranquility Base has replied
  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 139 of 160 (220257)
06-27-2005 10:13 PM 		Reply to: Message 138 by roxrkool
06-27-2005 10:03 PM

Re: YEC water problem
This is a science forum so I can't respond to Biblical questions here (there is a Biblical explanation however).
This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by roxrkool, posted 06-27-2005 10:03 PM roxrkool has not replied
  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 142 of 160 (220280)
06-27-2005 11:25 PM 		Reply to: Message 141 by TrueCreation
06-27-2005 10:19 PM

Re: TB Tell me again when did Noah's Flood occur
OK.
​
The point is that while you can say
​
Accelerated decay is about as relevant to CPT as abiogenesis is to Evolutionary Theory. The mechanism for CPT is runaway subduction. I do not adhear to CPT and have not for quite a long time, however it deserves more credit than has been given.
​
in isolation, for the reasons I mentioned earlier, *in the big picture* CPT does not make sense without accelerated decay because these are undountedly *empirically* coincident if you're in a YEC scenario. Sure you can look at runaway subduction as a fun toy but in a YEC scenario it's going to be side-by-side with accelerated decay and causally related by Occam.
​
This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 06-27-2005 11:28 PM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by TrueCreation, posted 06-27-2005 10:19 PM TrueCreation has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev123
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024