Bush promotes ID

quote:

---

It is the most widely excepted theory based on the least amount of evidence (none).

---

Hmm. I hear this a lot. You are welcome to join us in the science forums to try to explain your comment.

Oh, by the way, I just noticed your signature, Tal: Nice touch -- mentioning oil and cocaine in the same breath. Kind of invites comparison of the current war in Iraq to gang wars waged to control the drug market, eh?

Now, now, Charles.I think that Tal's post pretty much sums up the whole ID issue. "I [note the first person pronoun] cannot conceive how such a thing is possible. Therefore, there we must consider that a Magical Skyman is responsible for it."But I do agree with you; it would be nice to see Tal in the science forums.

IDers may do science, but it's usually not related to ID. In fact, we keep asking for an example of ID science, but nothing is ever presented.-

quote:

---

I hear evolutionists demand why don't they publish in peer-reviewed evolutionist journals, and when someone does, they say it should never have been published and try to ruin the editor's career that published.

---

The only example that remotely resembles this scenario involved a review paper, not a research paper; the paper was not submitted to the usual peer review process (since the paper was a review paper, not a research paper); and I seem to remember that the acceptance procedure was done contrary to the usual practice at that journal.But maybe you are thinking of a different example. It's hard to tell, since, as usual you are making a statement without actually supplying any details.

And there is definitely a fat guy in a red suit who flies all over the world, giving present to good boys and girls on Christmas Eve.I can make unsupported statements, too.