Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Purgatory
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 7 of 33 (244358)
09-17-2005 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Modulous
09-17-2005 9:22 AM


Re: Catholics
modulus' link writes:
"And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come."
....While this passage presents considerable difficulty.
Purgatory is a doctrine of the Roman Catholic church. The RC take on things is that it is: by faith AND by deeds that you get to heaven. Faith in God/Jesus/Holy Spirit AND the teaching, instructions of the RC church. And works: doing good deeds, being baptised, holy communion, confession before a priest etc. As far a purgatory goes, RC reckons that every soul will have unforgiven sin on it when the body in which is resides, dies. These sins needs to be 'purged' before the soul can enter heaven ("nothing unclean shall enter heaven"). The time a person spends in purgatory depends on the amount of sin there is and whether people still alive pray and offer masses for the soul (and so reduce it's time in purgatory.)
Whether or not a person went to purgatory or straight to hell depended on the type of sin on their soul. Venial (less serious) sin meant purgatory, mortal (serious) sin meant Hell. Both as defined by the RC church.
The difficulty referred to above arise out of the fact that the Bible itself doesn't actually say that there is any such thing as purgatory. The teaching is ex-Biblical. That this can happen arises from the fact the the RC faith is made up of Bible + RC Church teaching. That something isn't in the Bible doesn't mean it cannot be part of the RC faith. Other examples include: pope infallible, pope at all, hierarchial church, Mary Imaculate, Mary as Intercessor between man and God/Jesus, infant baptism, prayers for the dead etc
Purgatory has a chequered history in terms of abuse enable by it. The practice in Martin Luthers time, of selling 'indulgences' were one of the reasons for his rebellion against his church which helped spark the Reformation. Indulgences were church authorised discounts for purgatory. You could basically buy your way out of time in purgatory if you paid for it.
I'm not that au fait with things RC but have heard that thinking on purgo/venial/mortal sin may be changing - but I'm not sure
Non-RC's would consider purgatory a heresy. It's not in the Bible but is a man-made idea. The whole idea that you can 'earn' your own salvation by your actions is similarily considered a complete heresy. Not only does the Bible not teach this but is quite clear about how a person is saved and that it has nothing at all to do with their behaviour.

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 09-17-2005 9:22 AM Modulous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by RC Priest, posted 09-18-2005 10:14 PM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 11 of 33 (244812)
09-19-2005 7:40 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by RC Priest
09-18-2005 10:14 PM


Re: Correct Catholic View on Salvation and Purgatory
rcpriest writes:
“It is grace, the RC Church teaches that "has the power to justify us, that is, to cleanse us from our sins and to communicate to us ”the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ . ’”
If a life-long violent criminal has accepted Jesus as Lord and saviour and soon afterwards holds up a liquor store, murders the owner and gets shot dead by a policeman during the getaway does he go to hell? If so, why?
With regards to Purgatory, it is important to realize that it was believed by the earliest members of Christianity, as well as the Jews before them. II Maccabees 12:39-45 illustrates this historical truth.
Paul rebuked Peter due to the latter distorting the Gospel when he chose to hang with Jews so as not to be seen with unclean Gentiles. Was the council at Jerusalem not called in order to deal with the hangover of Jewish legalism which was trying to add something to the Gospel. The church was warned against false teaching that would come in, from within the body itself as soon as it was established.
What basis is there for believing that early Christian fathers got it right. There is nothing to say that they were inspired in their writing. So why should their writing be considered inerrant?
I want to make a very important distinction. II Maccabees 12:39-45 does two things. First it makes the philosophical/theological claim that to pray for the dead is a good thing, implying that there is some sort of intermediate state where departed individuals can benefit from our prayers. This claim can be rejected by those who do not view Maccabees as Sacred Scripture. But the second point is the one relevant to this post. The verse makes the historical claim that certain Jews from this time prayed for those who had died.
It is true that Maccabees is not accepted by many as scripture and if so, what it says is irrelevant in relation to doctrine. The Jews had all kinds of confused thinking, not least of which was the idea that righteousness came by following laws - ie: what you do affects your position with God (works)
Around the time of Jesus, we have rabbinical writings testifying to the existence of a ”Purgatory,’ though they would not have used that particular word. And throughout early Christianity we have hosts of early Church Fathers endorsing the view, as well as Biblical authors that are see to be hinting towards it.
Theres the rub I suppose. If you take things that are non-scriptural into account then you've got man-made (and thus fallible) in the equation. If you take scripture alone then a hint is all that is left. And a hint is not enough to form a doctrine with.
Logically speaking, from a Christian perspective, all people are sinners. While Jesus died for our sins, it doesn’t change the fact that we still sin, and it doesn’t change the fact that we are in need of forgiveness. When we die we will die a sinful being.
Scripturally speaking, it is sin which resides in the flesh which wars with the believers spirit - which has been justified. The old man is crucified with Christ and the person is resurrected - in Christ. And there is no condemnation for those that are in Christ. The old man is gone - he can't come back - irrespective of future sin. This, given that it is not we who sin but sin which dwells in our flesh. There is a distinction between spirit and flesh especially in the light of a person who is born of the spirit (or born again). Isn't it only the flesh which dies (and thus sin with it) on death, leaving only the justified spirit.
The point is though that purification takes place, and all Christian’s believe this. Catholics calls this Purgatory.
But the distinction is the a non-Catholic Christian believes it happens at the point of conversion - not after death. I'm not sure the word purification is biblical either: justified, sanctified, glorified seems to be the process
This message has been edited by iano, 19-Sep-2005 02:13 PM

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by RC Priest, posted 09-18-2005 10:14 PM RC Priest has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024