Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Randman's call for nonSecular education...
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 30 of 226 (259695)
11-14-2005 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by randman
11-14-2005 12:43 PM


Re: didn't read the whole post yet
randman writes:
As far as Catholicism, we should teach what that theology is.
I strongly disagree.
Catholic theology, as taught by a catholic, is likely to have a very different tone an emphasis than catholic theology as taught by an evangelical.
Any significant teaching of theology in the public schools will only generate ill will and dissent. The public schools should stay out of theology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by randman, posted 11-14-2005 12:43 PM randman has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 172 of 226 (260598)
11-17-2005 1:58 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by randman
11-17-2005 1:30 PM


Re: teaching about is not the same as believing
Wrong again, randman. There is lots of public expression of religion going on, and no evidence that it is being prohibited.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by randman, posted 11-17-2005 1:30 PM randman has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 200 of 226 (260773)
11-17-2005 11:42 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by randman
11-17-2005 11:38 PM


Re: quotes please
The Courts in the 20th century reinterpreted the establishment clause to refer to acts of public participation in religious expression rather than just banning laws referencing religion and so created, imo, a contradiction within the first amendment.
No, that's not correct.
What the courts did object to is religious expression conducted by a governmental or quasi-governmental body, on the basis that such expression amounts to establishment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by randman, posted 11-17-2005 11:38 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by randman, posted 11-17-2005 11:46 PM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 203 of 226 (260781)
11-18-2005 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 201 by randman
11-17-2005 11:46 PM


Re: quotes please
Same thing,
No, it isn't the same thing.
I'll point to things like Congress opening with prayer to illustrate the fact they didn't mean to prohibit things like Congress from opening with prayer,
That's quite different. That's congressmen voluntarily choosing to impose a religious service on themselves. They are not imposing it on anyone else.
Not sure of the current status on Christmas displays. I think they currently are okay if private groups do the display and it is broadly holiday season related rather than exclusively christian.
Sometimes the courts may have been too restrictive, but most of those problems have been corrected.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by randman, posted 11-17-2005 11:46 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by arachnophilia, posted 11-18-2005 12:05 AM nwr has not replied
 Message 206 by randman, posted 11-18-2005 12:43 AM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 209 of 226 (260797)
11-18-2005 12:56 AM
Reply to: Message 206 by randman
11-18-2005 12:43 AM


Re: quotes please
You don't think the nations legislative body opening up with Christian prayer to guide their work is not sending a message of establishment of religion more than a Decalogue sitting on some grass or hallway of some governmental building?
It does not in any way coerce the population into any religious observance.
Being somewhat cynical, I do think that it is mainly for show, and has more to do with winning votes in the next election than with practicing religion.
In the 10 commandments case that the court objected to, that can reasonably be seen as coercive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by randman, posted 11-18-2005 12:43 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by randman, posted 11-18-2005 1:06 AM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 212 of 226 (260807)
11-18-2005 1:30 AM
Reply to: Message 211 by randman
11-18-2005 1:06 AM


Re: quotes please
Actually having Congress open with prayer is much more a signal of endorsement of Christianity than a statue of the Ten Commandments.
The opening with prayer is an action by individuals excercising their freedom of religion. The statue is a action by the state.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by randman, posted 11-18-2005 1:06 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by randman, posted 11-18-2005 1:34 AM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 222 of 226 (260862)
11-18-2005 8:16 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by randman
11-18-2005 1:34 AM


Re: quotes please
opening with prayer is an official act of the entire legislative body.
The official acts of congress are known as "Acts of Congress". Can you identify which, if any, act of congress has to do with opening with prayer?
As far as I know, this is simply part of their working procedures, and not in any way an official act.
----------
I'll make my position clear. I would much prefer that there were no chaplain, and that there were no opening prayer. The congressmen should offer their prayers in private. The employment of a chaplain and the opening with prayer is an arrogant political act, and has little to do with the religious beliefs of the participants.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by randman, posted 11-18-2005 1:34 AM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024