Intelligent Design in Science Class - Sample curriculum please

its not explanatory, you are making the same fault filled arguement that everyone on the ID side makes, computers do not reproduce, humans do not design things that reproduce.
You are equating human design to living things, it is of course because its the only thing we can analyze because there is no way to detect if something living is designed, unless we know it is, we know human things are designed because we can go look in a factory or see it marked on the object
where is the mark to know life it designed?

I liked the idea the prof had at ku, before ID nuts beat him up
it should fall under a religious exploration class, rather than a science class.
as i said before, if ID was in science this would be how it would go.
day1: "today class we will discuss Intelligent design, first it is an unknown,undetectible,unexplainible proccess produced by an unknown enitity, most likely god, with no way of detection or explaination that evolution or abiogenesis can't explain, yet it is rightday2: "as we have finished with ID lets move on to the flying spegetti monster, who created pirates and midgets and beer" it fits very well since, you can explain things with it and has evidence, it is not a philosophy, it is a theory and we see it happen every day

link please for this

Thanks Mod
I just find claims like that strange so i wanted some real info since sometimes people do tend to read them a certain way

baseless claim, science classes teach what is considered the theory that science has shown to be correct another baseless claim, and a non sequitur at that! Could it be that rather than evolution be at fault it could be a general disintrest in science and math? Rather than blaming something that doesn't have anything to do with how education works, you could understand a fundimental problem with education.
that is, people do not want to have progress or teach children things they do not understand, that includes evolution, physics, higher maths and better understanding of english.
that is why public schools are terrible not because of some theory but peoples overall fear of science
as for private schools, they have more free-rein with students and not as many ignorent parents, so you can stop with this baseless arguementhome schooled children can be as stupid as public school children if the teacher is a moron too, and critical thinking is non-existant there too ignorant parents, and school boards that crumble to themThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 04-30-2006 08:29 PM

ok now you are just backpedaling, YOU brought up the corralation that evolution affects children's ability to learn math and science. you just made a huge strawman and now you are contradicting yourself.evolution IS taught in science classes as the scienctists are theorizing in the ToE. Evolution is a fact, no scientist doing science will deny this, unless they have some reason to do so that has nothing to do with science. what facts are you talking about? do you have any evidence that teachers are not presenting studients with facts? this has nothing to do with private schools and more to do with the teachers they hire and how much crap the parents can whine about, private schools are supported by people who arn't ignorent, public schools arn't
you are making corralations between things that have nothing to do with eachother and passing it off as fact they can do this, this doesn't mean they can just argue that evolution is wrong, because they don't agree with it. But the fact is you are not being remotely realistic at all.
Part of school is learning how to learn so they learn what the current scientific theories are, so later in life if they decide to go into science they can take what they learned and come up with a better theory if there is one.
Finding a better senario with evidence is how we should do things not just dismiss it because we disagree with it blame the parents and the goverment for making the school admins break down to their wishs, this has nothing to do with science or evolution, but corrupt politics and fear of progress