Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent Design in Science Class - Sample curriculum please
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 52 of 108 (302525)
04-08-2006 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by inkorrekt
04-08-2006 6:59 PM


Re: ID in History class!!!!!
quote:
If evolution is science, then what is naturalism?
There are two kinds of naturalism; ontological and methodological.
Ontological naturalism is the philosophical position that all that exists is the natural and that the supernatural does not exist.
Methodological naturalism posits that only that in nature which we can observe with our five senses can be explained using naturalistic explanations. It ignores the question of the existence or non-existence of the supernatural entirely.
The scientific method is based upon Methodological naturalism, and anyone doing real science uses methodological naturalism in their work.
No science is based upon ontological naturalism, nor is any scientist required to embrace ontological naturalism as a personal philosophy.
This is how it is possible that there are scientists of many different religions and philosophies but who all use methodological naturalism in their work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by inkorrekt, posted 04-08-2006 6:59 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 54 of 108 (302589)
04-09-2006 8:39 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by carini
04-08-2006 10:54 PM


Re: ID in History class!!!!!
quote:
I like complexity, not the simplest answer possible. In the case of how the world came to be the way it is today, ID in the form of christian creationism, is about the simplest explanation there is.
I would actually say that the ID/Creationist explanation is simplistic rather than simple.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 04-09-2006 08:39 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by carini, posted 04-08-2006 10:54 PM carini has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by DominionSeraph, posted 04-15-2006 10:48 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 60 of 108 (303602)
04-12-2006 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by inkorrekt
04-11-2006 10:40 PM


do you understand the difference now?
Ink, do you get what I am saying in Message #52?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by inkorrekt, posted 04-11-2006 10:40 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024