Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limestone Layers and the Flood
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 79 of 128 (297376)
03-22-2006 5:00 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by DBlevins
03-21-2006 12:13 AM


Re: Questions for you
The history of the earth is filled with transgressions and regressions of sea's over the continents. During high sea levels and long periods of time you can have a build up of limestone, expecially in warm shallow areas such as coral reefs. When sea level slowly drops it can leave behind shallow seas blocked from mixing with the main body of water and as the "inland" sea evaporates it becomes more briny. This briny sea can still percolate through the limestone and the Magnesium in this briny sea can start replacing some of the Calcium ions in the limestone. (as a side note, there is an area in Michigan iirc where such a large inland sea occured and we can see this in the rock record. Also in Texas, thus the high oil abundance there.) This chemical replacement of ions forms dolomite which is basically limestone, just that some of the calcium ions have been replaced with magnesium.
Except of course for the time factor, all such scenarios are quite consistent with what a Flood would likely have done -- left large inland seas for instance, which slowly evaporated or seeped into the ground. The flood would have left "shore lines" too in the process of receding. Also no doubt tides and wave action that covered a lot of distance across the continents as the flood receded.
This message has been edited by Faith, 03-22-2006 05:04 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by DBlevins, posted 03-21-2006 12:13 AM DBlevins has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Jazzns, posted 03-22-2006 5:05 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 81 of 128 (297383)
03-22-2006 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Jazzns
03-22-2006 5:05 PM


Re: Questions for you
I believe it is a possibility, consistent with the idea of a flood. That's all I said. I'm sure geologists can come up with all kinds of OE-based objections. Then it's just a matter of finding a creationist geologist for battling out the interpretive scenarios, the possibilities, the conjectures, with scientific considerations because there's no way to PROVE any of it.
This message has been edited by Faith, 03-22-2006 05:25 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Jazzns, posted 03-22-2006 5:05 PM Jazzns has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by edge, posted 03-22-2006 5:50 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 83 by Percy, posted 03-22-2006 6:28 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024