Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Define faith?
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 127 (29019)
01-13-2003 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by erik6string
01-13-2003 5:36 PM


Faith is a response to God as revealed to us daily through human messengers.
The scope of the Bible vastly out-does that of any other religious book. Creation, the flood, languages, races, the revelation of God, salvation and the future are all accounted for. Thematic consistency and of historical events across 2000 years is wihtout comparison. Archeoogical eveidence is staggering:
"Without initially starting out to discover the historical Bible, I have come to the conclusion that much of the Old Testament contains real history." David Rohl, who is an agnostic archeologist.
The families we are all born to reveal the Christian God. The Christian God is one of fatherhood, brotherhood and even marriage of a kind (Christ and his bride the church).
Other gods are distant and mystical. The Christian God is near to every heart and practical. The classic fire and brimestone message, while containing truth is actually a dsitortion of Christianity. Throughout the ages we are saved through our responses to Christ as we know him:
Acts 17:29,30 "Therefore since we are God's offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone--an image made by man's design and skill. In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent."
Jesus is the way but in the absence of the direct revelation of the last 2000 years we still meet Him through our parents, families, communities, bosses and authorities:
1 Peter 2:13 Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority,
Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.
Colossians 3:20 Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.
2 Cor 4:6 He has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of God's glory in the face of Jesus Christ.
I Cor 11:3 But I want you to know that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of the woman, and God is the head of Christ.
It says: Christ is the head of every man.
Our responses, at all levels, throughout the ages, to the marred headship we have as children and adults is part of our meeting with the Christian God. We learn to reposnd with a right attitude to marred headship becasue we ourselves are marred, our parents and authorities are marred and Christ himself submitted himself to marring and weakness.
Christianity works becasue the cross turns apparent weakness into strength. The cross was not a plan B but it is the way the Godhead lives and interacts:
The lamb was slain from the foundation of the world. Rev 13:8
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-13-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by erik6string, posted 01-13-2003 5:36 PM erik6string has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Gzus, posted 01-14-2003 4:30 AM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 5 by Primordial Egg, posted 01-14-2003 5:36 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 127 (29143)
01-14-2003 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by erik6string
01-14-2003 12:30 AM


erik6
Firstly let me just let me say even more plainly than I did earlier that the most important thing for all of us to do is listen to our consciences and those around us who our conscience tells us have been given to speak into our lives. I believe that the Bible does say this (I wont quote the verse again as requsted by you!) and it makes sense for this to be the most imporant thing to God.
So I am almost happy to say nothing other than that. However, in following my conscience and those around me I have become convinced that God is specifically the Christian God and so I recommend this God to you. So your question is then why I am convinced. It is partly due to the Bible (see my previous post) and partly due to my daily interactions with God in prayer and situations and partly due to the miraculous and near miraculous. All together I am utterly convinced of the Christian God.
I have experienced the events that Scripture associates with conversion. A conscience pang of guilt of sin, a conscience comfort of the Holy Spirit of forgiveness and love, the experience of being 'filled with the Spirit', including the outward signs described in Acts 2 and since then the love, direction and disciplining of the Father, Son and HS.
I found that although I don't know what is around the corner, when I look back on my life so far it is not random and I can see the guiding hand of God. In addition, since I came to beleive I have, on a handful of occasions, experienced undeniable miracles that unfortunately I can't prove to anyone but myself.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-14-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by erik6string, posted 01-14-2003 12:30 AM erik6string has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by erik6string, posted 01-16-2003 5:44 PM Tranquility Base has replied
 Message 11 by erik6string, posted 01-16-2003 5:44 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 24 by nator, posted 01-20-2003 8:54 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 127 (29303)
01-16-2003 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by erik6string
01-16-2003 5:44 PM


Erik
I mean that, your devotion and faith seems adequetely explained when spoken in terms of neuroscience.
This may seem plausible to you - consciousness bia emergence, conviction by psycology etc. Although I appreciate that our brains operate by neurosceince I also believe we are a triune being as God is (body, soul, spirit). As I mentioned I have personally seen the miraculous since I believed so I know you are wrong. But I believe you are just as wrong in looking at creation and thinking it could arrive in this state by chance and adaptation.
Granted, to many, biblical means of reasoning is sufficient
It is Biblical reasoning + conscience + life events/responses + the miraculous. If God is God that is how it works.
Yet, Christianity thrives on oppression of women, children, and basically anyone man judges to be of lesser status.
Scripture does not support this. I do not support 99% of what has gone on in Christianity! There is a Biblical 'order' to living, but not one of oppression. I submit to both Christ and worldly authorities analagously but differently to the way a child submits to their parents. This is how God created it to be. Families are a picture of the Godhead. Even the submission of a wife to a husband is pictured in the churches submission to Christ but look what glory the 'Bride of Christ' is revealed in in Rev 12/13. The husband lays down his life for his wife as Christ laid down his. This is how Christian family living should also be. It is not oppression but God's way. When corrupted by man it is very evil, I agree.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-20-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by erik6string, posted 01-16-2003 5:44 PM erik6string has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by nator, posted 01-20-2003 9:06 AM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 127 (29597)
01-19-2003 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Primordial Egg
01-14-2003 10:54 AM


PE
If you read my posts in this thread you'll see that I'm actually trying to explain why faith is geographical and why to some extent it doesn't matter. While I 100% beleive that Christ is the only way, it is clear that Scripture also points out that, down through the ages, we can all respond to a marred face of Christ's headship in the creation, our parents, families, authorities and situations. So whilst God blessed certain of us with a direct revelation of Christ I don't think that God left the rest of the world without a witness of Christ. Those who want everything neat and tidy may prefer the fire and brimestone God or that Christianity is nonsense but I believe the Biblical God has sufficiently explained the conundrum and that neither of these interpretations is correct.
Christ said that even a natural father 'does not give a stone to a son who asks for bread'. Creation and people reveal God, the creator and redeemer. Acts 17 tells us that God accepted pagan worship over the ages. But when God gives us a direct view of himself then I'll take that view every time. In our scenario the world has creation and families, the OT directly had God the Father and the NT directly revealed the Son and HS.
I'll just post some of Acts 17 again. It is clear that the Biblical God wants to see us find God wherever (and whenever) we are:
Acts 17:22Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: "Men of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. 23For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you.
24"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. 25And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else. 26From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. 27God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. 28'For in him we live and move and have our being.' As some of your own poets have said, 'We are his offspring.'
29"Therefore since we are God's offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone--an image made by man's design and skill. 30In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. 31For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to all men by raising him from the dead."
32When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, "We want to hear you again on this subject." 33At that, Paul left the Council. 34A few men became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others.
In the above passage (vs 27) it says 'God did this' so that men could seek and find Him. Did what? Ordained the places and times of all peoples of the Earth (vs 26)! God does care about all peoples of the Earth pre and post the Christian era. This is confirmed in plain English in vs 29 & 30.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-19-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Primordial Egg, posted 01-14-2003 10:54 AM Primordial Egg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Chavalon, posted 01-21-2003 8:51 PM Tranquility Base has replied
 Message 46 by Primordial Egg, posted 01-22-2003 9:51 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 127 (29705)
01-20-2003 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by nator
01-20-2003 9:06 AM


Scraf
The way the secular world measures equality is a very shallow yard stick in our opinion. It's all about 'having ones own way'. In Christianity life is about living up to the potential God has for us, not what we think we want. What God promises is that the potential he has for every individual is the best we could have. One simply should trust Him and then he will prove Himself to you on that issue.
To you the Christian woman's role is not 'good enough'. I believe God would say that you mock a truly wonderful role that is 100 times better than apparently sucessful living as democratically equal head of the family. That simply is not the way God created families to be. It is not truly satisfying for thewoman or of benefit to the family. When men open their eyes and women fill out the sphere of their role familes really work.
Democratic equality is not the seed of identity that God births into women. To get what 'seems nice' women sell their birth rights. Exactly the same thing happens for men who are chauvinisits, lazy, disinterested in taking up their role in family life or in providing for their families.
What may seem like a fundamentalist disaster to you is in fact people beginning to take of their masks and be who they are. This present, and possibly final 'reformation' of the church is primarily family-based and not primarily doctrinal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by nator, posted 01-20-2003 9:06 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by nator, posted 01-21-2003 9:16 AM Tranquility Base has replied
 Message 57 by Chavalon, posted 01-24-2003 5:25 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 127 (29806)
01-21-2003 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by nator
01-21-2003 9:16 AM


Schraf
This practical word of the gospel is hard to take. I agree. I have struggled with who I am at recently and have had to hear from human faces of Christ.
How do you think Christ felt when he gradually realized who he was? I bet he had laid eyes on some potential wives or may have wanted to become Nazereth's best carpenter. But at the same time he gradually found out who he was and what his call was. It is no different for us. We all take up our cross and do it for what is on the other side of it. It goes against everything natural that is in us and yet the word in our hearts is sufficent to direct us if we chose to listen.
I agree it is an 'icky' gospel. I have personally experienced the ick. I am also experiencing the victory on the other side of the cross also. If this message did not offend you there would be somethign wrong with you. It offended me too.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-21-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by nator, posted 01-21-2003 9:16 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by nator, posted 01-21-2003 7:59 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 127 (29821)
01-21-2003 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by nator
01-21-2003 7:59 PM


Schraf
I'm just reflecting what I'm reading, hearing and experiencing. Yes, it is my strong conviction is that it is for all of us but I'm not going to force it on a single person. Everyone is dignified by the right to their own response to the gospel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by nator, posted 01-21-2003 7:59 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 01-22-2003 8:56 AM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 127 (29822)
01-21-2003 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Chavalon
01-21-2003 8:51 PM


Chavalon
There is much clear evidence of a far greater richness of the Bible than the Quran.
The Bible reveals a God that relates within himself and with mankind just as people interact within families and communities: fatherhood, brotherhood and 'marriage' (Christ to the church). The Quran reveals primarily a legalistic God. The Biblical God reveals that legalism operates only when grace is taken for granted. In other words when we respond in right attitude we automatically live in a godly manner. But ultimately the evidence comes from experience.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Chavalon, posted 01-21-2003 8:51 PM Chavalon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Primordial Egg, posted 01-22-2003 9:42 AM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 49 by Chavalon, posted 01-22-2003 6:13 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 127 (29933)
01-22-2003 6:18 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by nator
01-22-2003 8:56 AM


Schraf
I am actually very curious about your response to the Barna divorce statistics.
Somehting I have noticed about 'born-again' churches, both in the US and here in Australia, is that they often also proclaim a 'prosperity' or 'name it and claim it' teaching. Whilst I would class my church within the renewal category the direction we believe God has taken us is down an 'accountability' direction and this has distanced us from 'prosperity doctrine' churches.
What I am saying is that a lot of 'born agains' have slipped into a 'self-mode' which may have led to the high divorce rates. These self-based teachings bypass the practcal daily aspects of the cross I have been talking about IMO. In short I do not believe renewal churches are, as a whole, teaching truly accountable living. I hope that explains why this data is not a conundrum for me.
If even you get that "ick" factor, why do you think it is right?
The cross was 'ick' to Christ too. He wept tears of blood. We, as He did, do it for the 'joy set before us'. Easily said of course. Christ said 'take up your cross'. Does that really mean 'go to India' or does it actaully mean 'live out your identity not your fantasy'?
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-22-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 01-22-2003 8:56 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by nator, posted 01-23-2003 8:19 AM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 127 (29940)
01-22-2003 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Chavalon
01-22-2003 6:13 PM


Chavalon
Despite your reference Islam is overwhelmingly legalistic.
For me creation, life, relationships and my interactons with Christ and his written word and the church speak to me of the Christian God as being real.
Your experience is equally valid.
I still beleive you will find the Christian God if you seek God.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 01-22-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Chavalon, posted 01-22-2003 6:13 PM Chavalon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Chavalon, posted 01-24-2003 5:11 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 127 (30072)
01-23-2003 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by nator
01-23-2003 8:19 AM


Schraf
What I will say is that when men are living accountably as men and women are living accountably as women families work. I can cite no statistics to back this up. Rather, I believe this is the grassroots key to life for families (as indeed it always has been).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by nator, posted 01-23-2003 8:19 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by nator, posted 01-24-2003 8:24 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 127 (30762)
01-30-2003 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by nator
01-30-2003 10:50 AM


Schraf
The point is that in this way of life we are all children of God - always, regardless of age. This is the key to life IMO. Men submit to human faces of Christ just as women do. Yes it is a differnt function but God does not see either the funcitons or persons lesser than another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by nator, posted 01-30-2003 10:50 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by nator, posted 01-31-2003 9:46 AM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 80 of 127 (31079)
02-02-2003 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by nator
01-31-2003 9:46 AM


Schraf
However, if what you are saying is that God likes it that women submit to men in all things, well, then to me you are saying that God likes women to be kept without full adult standing in society.
But men are to sumbit to men so therefore we neither have 'full adult' standing in your view (of my view!). I don't want any rights above what God wants to give me! I (now) prefer reflecting my career/life decisions to other men and willingly weighing their advice. I'm convinced this is how life is meant to be. You may like the modern view of every family locked away in its castle. I hate that way now. I open my life to those I am accountable too. We open the upbringing of our children to our entire home Bible study group. I have been taken aside by others and had harsh things said to me for the good of my children:
Zech 13:6 If someone asks him, 'What are these wounds on your body [2] ?' he will answer, 'The wounds I was given at the house of my friends'.
No-one is forcing anyone to do it! We have had the occasional wife leaving a husband on the issue. That is sad but a reality. We have had men moving to other churches. That is sad too but reality. Christ wept tears of blood over his call.
It really can't be spun in any way that makes it palatable.
Agreed until God opens our eyes to an even bigger world than we imagine in my experience.
Isn't it possible that this part of the Bible, like the parts about the monetary value of slaves and women, is just a cultural artifact from the days when women were considered less valuable than a cow, and that they are not relevant today?
It's possible but not consistent with the theme of Christ and his bride, the church or the manner in which I believe God is healing family relationships on this planet in my community.
Families in the west are in a terrible state. Children do not respect parents (for good reason). They grow up unteachable and insecuare and a significant amount enter into crime drugs and unhealthy consideration for the opposite sex. Society is a mess but the book of Malachi promises that one day 'the hearts of the fathers will turn to the children and the the hearts of the children will turn to the fathers'. That is what we believe the current move of God is and that the refomation of families and families of families is the way it will happen.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 02-02-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by nator, posted 01-31-2003 9:46 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by nator, posted 02-02-2003 7:19 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 84 of 127 (31144)
02-03-2003 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by nator
02-02-2003 7:19 PM


Schraf
Whether man or woman, submission is a weighing up. Everyone has the dignity of their own response. Sometimes advice is advice and sometimes advice is direction. It is up to the listener, whether man or woman, to respond appropriately. That is the difference between an adult Christian relationship and a child-like one. A child (of certain age) has no choice (but is age appropriately parented). An adult submits of their own free will.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 02-03-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by nator, posted 02-02-2003 7:19 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by nator, posted 02-03-2003 5:01 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 91 of 127 (31181)
02-03-2003 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by nator
02-03-2003 5:01 PM


Schraf
The wife fascilitates the direction of the husband putting her uniqueness and talents into it and at times she may be crucial in advising a complete change in direction. (The Lord told Abraham 'listen to your wife'). But, yes, she is not democratic joint-head of the family.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by nator, posted 02-03-2003 5:01 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Chavalon, posted 02-04-2003 9:09 AM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 97 by nator, posted 02-04-2003 10:36 AM Tranquility Base has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024