a good example being claiming that if something looks to an evo one way based on evos adopting prejudicial assumptions, that somehow this is all God's fault.
No offense, but this theory opens up some vast problems imo.
The story of the fall has always looked silly to me. God punishes Adam and Eve for breaking a rule. The rule is not to eat the fruit.
Eating the fruit is an evil/sinful act, but without eating the fruit, they cannot understand this.
Catch22? I thought so.
Now, tho it appears that the eating of the fruit, which caused man's ability to commit evil, may have caused them to
decide to eat the fruit in the first place.
But it's even more nosensical than punishing them for becoming capable of understanding good and evil, which is a perrequisite of being good.
Make any sense to you?