We can point at the Bible and say that we don't trust the God portrayed therein, giving us our excuse.
What about the other revelations? Those of the Hindu's for example. Why aren't you using them as your excuse?
God, on the other hand, could point to us and say that since we chose to reject the Bible, we are being judged on our understanding, behavior, and in regards to what we do know.
The Bible isn't aware of itself as a book. It's a bunch of different scrolls of writings that people have compiled. Why wouldn't God point to your rejection of the Upanishads? Or Tao te Ching?
Your argument is totally sectartian. That the God the Jews understood is not the God of other people, that they had sole monopoly on communicating with the source of the universe who denied it to anyone else. That God only dealt with a very limited number of people, many of whom didn't have a very spiritual understanding when compared to people like Buddha, Lao Tzu, the authors of the Upanishads, or Ramana for example.
I think God would not want you only to pay attention to small exclusive judgemental self righteous sects but to the full range of understanding and revelation, much of which is much better sourced, preserved, and accounted for than that of the Judeo Christian collection of copies of copies of books assembled and variously translated into various collections called Bibles. I quite imagine he could ask you why you haven't availed yourself of the remarkably recent, clear, complete information that Shri Ramana Maharshi has given us about the source of the universe. And seriously, why haven't you?
lfen