Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Question About Deception
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 62 of 75 (321325)
06-14-2006 1:47 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by ringo
06-14-2006 1:42 AM


Re: no deception
They knew they were not suppossed to eat the fruit, right?
Or are you claiming they didn't even know that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by ringo, posted 06-14-2006 1:42 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by ringo, posted 06-14-2006 1:51 AM randman has replied
 Message 73 by ramoss, posted 06-14-2006 11:27 AM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 64 of 75 (321330)
06-14-2006 2:12 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by ringo
06-14-2006 1:51 AM


Re: no deception
They knew they were not supposed to eat the fruit. They knew it was wrong. They were not intimate with the concept...that's true, and so they lacked knowledge, but that doesn't mean they didn't know it was wrong to disobey God and eat the fruit.
If they didn't know it was wrong, then why the punishment? You seem to be arguing you think they believed it was OK to disobey God.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by ringo, posted 06-14-2006 1:51 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by ringo, posted 06-14-2006 2:25 AM randman has replied
 Message 66 by sidelined, posted 06-14-2006 2:27 AM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 67 of 75 (321333)
06-14-2006 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by ringo
06-14-2006 2:25 AM


Re: no deception
Yea, but somehow I don't think you'd curse the ground and boot the 2 year old out of home for doing something they were incapable of realizing was wrong. Oh, and getting booted out of Eden was punishment. So was death, and the ground being cursed, etc, etc,....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by ringo, posted 06-14-2006 2:25 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by ringo, posted 06-14-2006 2:38 AM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 68 of 75 (321334)
06-14-2006 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by sidelined
06-14-2006 2:27 AM


Re: no deception
You do know that you have contradicted yourself in this sentence don't you?
No I haven't. People can know things without being intimate with them.
To lack knowledge is the same as saying you do not know.
Nope, not at all. You can lack knowledge of an area or thing but still know about the thing. They knew it was wrong, but they didn't have an intimacy with what wrong really was. Their awareness and knowledge was limited. For example, I know what a woman's cycle is, but I haven't experienced it, and so my knowledge is limited.
Think of it this way to use an old-fashioned and biblical use of "know." A man may know who a woman is, but not "know" her.
God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it,
is this 1984 or something? She clearly knows God doesn't want them to eat the fruit. Isn't that what it says?
God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it,
How can you read it any other way? You seem to be claiming she is saying God said to eat the fruit.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by sidelined, posted 06-14-2006 2:27 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by sidelined, posted 06-14-2006 11:11 AM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 72 of 75 (321430)
06-14-2006 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by sidelined
06-14-2006 11:11 AM


Re: no deception
Think of it this way. Eve knew that if she ate of it that she would die and that was not a good thing, but she did not know what death entailed fully perhaps.
On not arguing with the serpent, the serpent wasn't trying to argue with her. He was trying to plant distrust of God in her mind and succeeded. Even with that, Paul writes that Adam was not deceived and so he did wrong out of pure allegience to his wife, loving her more than God.
But maybe this is getting too much off-topic.
To get back on-topic, the idea that because God has created a world where we have to search for answers is an indication of deception on God's part is a miguided and wrong idea.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by sidelined, posted 06-14-2006 11:11 AM sidelined has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 75 of 75 (321441)
06-14-2006 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by ramoss
06-14-2006 11:27 AM


Re: no deception
why don't you propose a new topic if you really want me to answer?
Admin has already stated this is veering off-topic. Plus, I think my previous comments covered this several times over.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by ramoss, posted 06-14-2006 11:27 AM ramoss has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024