Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bob Cornuke and Noah's Ark in Iran?
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 34 of 56 (329195)
07-06-2006 3:21 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by randman
07-06-2006 3:18 AM


Re: so we have a shipwreck resting at 13,000 feet?
randman
Do you have evidence those claims are wrong?
Where's the pitch?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 3:18 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 3:23 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 37 of 56 (329199)
07-06-2006 3:29 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by randman
07-06-2006 3:23 AM


Re: so we have a shipwreck resting at 13,000 feet?
randman
I don't think any amount of evidence would ever be enough to satisfy critics, such as some here.
Buddy the bible itself states that it was convered within and without in pitch. Just how the hell is that an unreasonable question to ask of what is supposed to be the real ark?
I mean if the thing exists then it will stand up to the scrutiny of investiagtion.
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 3:23 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 12:18 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 44 of 56 (329372)
07-06-2006 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by randman
07-06-2006 12:18 PM


Re: so we have a shipwreck resting at 13,000 feet?
randman
I imagine like any sort of binder, that it would decay over time.
If that is the case then how is it that boards show no gaps wherein the pitch must have been present to seal the joints?
Is there no evidence of that much pitch left behind and if not why not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 12:18 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 12:49 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024