Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible 2003 Edition by God et al.
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 64 (33025)
02-24-2003 6:38 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by drummachine
02-23-2003 9:33 PM


quote:
drummachine
You believe the bible is not for today, how?

tales of fire and brimstone don't mix well with smart kids

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by drummachine, posted 02-23-2003 9:33 PM drummachine has not replied

  
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 64 (35353)
03-26-2003 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Joralex
03-26-2003 1:42 PM


Re: My last post on account of...
quote:
If you are suggesting that "Godidit" be allowed back into scientific exlanations, please explain how this "answer" is a benefit to inquiry and of understanding nature."

The above is a ridiculous and frequently parroted argument. That God created the universe in no way prevents us from examining how His universe operates. Newton and Maxwell, to name just a few, had absolutely no difficulty with "God did it" and then having extremely scientifically-productive lives studying how He did it.

Why say Godidit? Why not Satandidit or TheGodsdidit or Mydeadcatdidit or Buddhadidit or Allahdidit or it just happened for no apparent reason? Why God, specifically?
Your argument can be used to justify an infinite number of absurd statements. Scientists usually do the intelligent thing and say 'We don't know'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Joralex, posted 03-26-2003 1:42 PM Joralex has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by judge, posted 03-26-2003 10:31 PM Gzus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024