Pasteur's experiment disproved the old idea that lfie was continually coming into existence. Since evolution requires fewer instances of life coming into existence than creationism then Pasteru's experiment is evidence for evolution.
And you're completely wrong to say that evolution requires abiogenesis. Evolution only needs life - probably less than that, although that requires getting into the question of defining "life". So unless you are denying the existence of life abiogenesis really isn't an issue.
quote:
So, a website about philosophy has to pander to your particular brand of philosophy in order to be legitimate? BTW, philosophy is an objective study where it seeks to express ones' view about this or that. That's pretty much what philosophy is all about. So I'm not sure where objection to it lies.
That's not at all what I am saying. What I am saying is that there is clear evidence that the site is far from objective - in fact highly biased. It's not a good resource for information on philosphy or science because it can't be trusted. The author can't even do good research.