Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the TOE falsifiable and if it was, would it advance Biblical Creationism
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 20 of 169 (343542)
08-26-2006 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Faith
08-25-2006 8:20 PM


Re: A puzzle
faith writes:
because the ToE is unfalsifiable.
Not at all. For example, I'm pretty sure a dinosaur fossil mingled with a modern human fossil would cause the ToE some serious problems!
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 8:20 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-26-2006 10:46 AM RickJB has replied
 Message 22 by Faith, posted 08-26-2006 10:55 AM RickJB has replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 31 of 169 (343622)
08-26-2006 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Faith
08-26-2006 10:55 AM


Re: A puzzle
faith writes:
...there is no way to prove anything about the past.
Does this assertion include the content of the Bible?
faith writes:
If a dinosaur and a human fossil were found together, the theory would simply be adjusted to put humans farther back or dinosaurs farther into the future.
Perhaps, but I'm not saying it would falsify the entire ToE in one sweep! It would, however, provide your side of the argument with some supporting physical evidence - something which you totally lack at this point.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Faith, posted 08-26-2006 10:55 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Faith, posted 08-26-2006 2:42 PM RickJB has replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 32 of 169 (343626)
08-26-2006 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Archer Opteryx
08-26-2006 10:46 AM


Re: Creationism's blown opportunity
Archer writes:
It's worth noting that creationists recently had a golden opportunity to falsify the entire theory of evolution at one go. Evolutionary science would be dead today if they had succeeded.
Interesting. Do you have any links to articles from that time?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-26-2006 10:46 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-27-2006 8:07 PM RickJB has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 36 of 169 (343644)
08-26-2006 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Faith
08-26-2006 2:42 PM


Re: A puzzle
faith writes:
No, it wouldn't even give us any supporting evidence. The ToE can swallow up anything, BECAUSE it is unfalsifiable.
No, it is a sucessful theory with demonstrable predictive qualities.
All YEC folk have to do to fully falsify evolution is to formulate a competing hypothesis that better explains what we see in nature. You seem to be tacitly admitting that this isn't possible, however.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Faith, posted 08-26-2006 2:42 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 08-26-2006 9:58 PM RickJB has replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 49 of 169 (343922)
08-27-2006 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Faith
08-26-2006 9:58 PM


Re: A puzzle
faith writes:
You see our hypothesis in action in our answers on threads like this. What's actually needed is for evos to recognize the sense we are making.
What hypothesis?
What sense?
You have no evidence - only a collection of contradictary opinions. Why should anyone pay attention to YEC ad-hoc attempts to redefine or criticise scientific fields which they have not studied?
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 08-26-2006 9:58 PM Faith has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 87 of 169 (344169)
08-28-2006 3:14 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by Faith
08-28-2006 3:05 AM


Re: no zero-sum solution
faith writes:
Maybe He won't. Maybe He doesn't want this problem solved. That's crossed my mind many times. He wants trust in Him by faith. He may withhold knowledge in this particular theologically sensitive area for that purpose.
Heh, the ultimate get-out clause.
No evidence - it must all be part of God's plan!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Faith, posted 08-28-2006 3:05 AM Faith has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 89 of 169 (344176)
08-28-2006 3:22 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by Hughes
08-28-2006 3:03 AM


Hughes writes:
..is the fact that it's now illegal to bring up said difficulties of evolutionary theory in the high school science classroom in Dover.
Total misrepresentation. Teaching diffciluties in evolutionary theory is one thing (there are still many more things to learn, as any biologist will tell you), teaching outright lies and mischaracterisations regarding the ToE by poorly qualified YEC or ID "scientists" is quite another.
Would you trust your health to a snake-oil salesman or to a qualified doctor?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Hughes, posted 08-28-2006 3:03 AM Hughes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Hughes, posted 08-28-2006 3:53 AM RickJB has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024