Hypermacroevolution? Hypermicroevolution

So these differences aren't big enough to separate these into different "kinds"?I presume this means that the cat "kind" on the ark had all the extra genes needed for all of these.I presume then this means that Noah had all the genes needed for the gorillas, orangs and chimps that must be his decendents. They are closer than my cat is to a tiger.Edited by NosyNed, : fix dbcodes

Excuse me; haven't you said a number of times that you don't understand the genetic discussions that have been going on around here?

and Well, are you just starting or is there decades of work to review?It's odd that after decades there doesn't seem to be coherent work to review and discuss. We get the zany pronouncements of the likes of Hovind that other creationists disavow and we get the half formed fuzzy suggestions of others.I go to AIG and ICR (which I have been, mistakenly perhaps as the major sources of creationist research and views) and see things which are, at best, misleading used to support their ideas. I note that no one can go to AIG or ICR and point out the place where they answer the fundamental point of the correlations threads about dating.We wait a year and no one shows up here who is wiling and able to debate the issue of the correlations.What has been going on in these decades?

So the short time --- "just starting" is in reference to the discussions here.The "decades" is to the research done by creationists outside of here.Right?But you aren't using any of that research? You are going to start all over here?